Emma Watson is not interested in things 'hot' and 'sexy'

From kidzworld.com June 2013, "How did Nicki's costumes inform your performance? 'The costumes, hair and makeup really helped me get into character. All of those things really put Nicki and her environment into perspective for me. Nicki isn't as interested in fashion as (the) Rebecca (character). She's much more interested in things being 'hot' or 'sexy.' The trashier and tighter the better. All of my usual fashion rules just went out the window. Nicki was all about visible panty lines, bras, cleavage, very short skirts, lots of high heels, big hoop earrings. A lot of bling, basically.'"



Let's see. I see some panty lines, not any bras it seems, I see cleavage and very short skirts, and some of them have high heels, a few hoop earrings, and some a little tight. There are some candids, a few talk shows and two award shows with a few photo shoots mixed in here. These are all outfit her character or Alexis Neiers who it is based off of would wear. None of them are from the Bling Ring movie. Some are from before and some are after.

Now what exactly were the fashion rules of hers that she broke for the Bling Ring character? I'm confused to what they actually are because she broke them long before playing Nicki. Looks to me she embraces the hot and sexy look. This is another case of Emma trying to come off as being modest and proper. And you know people believe it. Her fans that look at every photo of her would take that quote and believe it as gospel. Yes on occasion Emma dresses classy, but you can't deny sometimes she also dresses trashy.

From www.wmagazine.com May 2013, "Did her outfits help you get into character?' Who wouldn’t love to go to work in Uggs and very low-slung tracksuit bottoms? The iconic detail of Nicki is her tramp stamp. It’s a lotus flower, a Buddhist-like symbol just above her butt crack. Really classy! [Laughs] And at one point I told the costume designer, “You can see my bra strap in this top; shouldn’t we pin it?” And she said, “No, sweetie—Nicki is all about her bra strap showing.” I was like, Right, okay, different mind."

And she's worried about showing a harmless bra strap?

Ok this is fun. Let's here what else Miss. Modesty has to say The first quote is hilarious if you look at some of the photos above.

From omg.yahoo.com W magazine May 2013, “I’ve never wanted to grow up too fast: I wanted to wear a sports bra until I was 22! The allure of being sexy never really held any excitement for me. I’ve never been in a terrible rush to be seen as a woman.” ......From Elle magazine April 2011 iheartwatson.net, "Does having short hair make you dress differently? ’I think it’s made me bolder in my fashion choices. It’s allowed me to dress more sexily.’” .....From styleite.com November 2010, “I wish I’d done more naughty things. Three months ago I cut my hair and at that moment I felt I became a woman. I’m ready to start taking risks.” .....From wwd.com November 2010 “I mean, I just wasn’t allowed to do anything: wasn’t allowed to cut my hair, put on nail varnish, tan, wear a bra that made my boobs in any way look [larger], have any flesh showing, wear any makeup when I was playing Hermione. I always had to back-comb my hair — ‘She looks too pretty, take down the blush or the mascara, take it off."

She's such a bullshitter, lol. Seriously they need an award show for the worlds biggest bullshitter because Emma would take top prize home each year. That quote came from her W Magazine spread. Go check that out to see the hypocrisy. As for wanting to wear a sports bra until she was 22. That's so funny it's stupid. She's always tried to come off as a woman and sexy is just about every one of her magazine photo shoots the last 5 years. Here are a few examples. She's not giving the camera these looks or poses for nothing. If it was never an allure then why do it, and why do it like a boss because she knows how to have eye sex with the camera.



Here is a little comparison with skirts. On the left is how Emma wants you to think how she dresses all the time without shorty skirts, and on the right (not every mini skirt she's worn) is how she sometimes dresses with short skirts. Be it some on the right are tasteful but she claims not to wear short skirts (aka minis). You can't get them any shorter without showing your who-ha.



Here is a little Bling Ring character versus Emma Watson. Like the very first photo set I can't post them all. If you are interested do a search yourself, and you will discover her fashion is a lot like her character in Bling Ring with being hot, sexy and tight with hoop earrings to boot.



Here is how delusional her fans can be. When I read this response at the dailymail about Emma's costumes on the Bling Ring I was like are you fucking serious? Are you people blind?

From dailymail.co.uk June 2013, "Emma dearest just be yourself you are so pretty.. - stephanieanne , Toronto Canada, 15/6/2013 11:36" Err, the 'new look' is for a role in a movie. I don't think she'd be caught dead dressed like this in real life. Do you have trouble differentiating between reality and fiction or is it reading comprehension that is your difficulty? Dur..."

If she wants to wear mini skirts while showing cleavage while braless, and have high heels on, she can wear them every day as far as I am concerned. That part does not bother me because I'm not a conservative prude. Wear what you want because I lose no sleep over it. The issue is she keeps on saying she does not when she does. She implies she is modest person, and therefore better than females that do wear them. She slut shames females when she's no better.

And all these photos of examples I've shown really don't even cover it. I can't post every photo shoot and candid, but I think you get the general idea.

Emma Watson returning to Brown University.... again

I did so many posts on her education non-sense. Go to the right side of my page. Go down to University and enjoy. Check them out to be better informed, and to read her lies and spin.

Here is the deal without adding a plethora of quotes from her and information I posted in the past.

She went to Brown the fall of 2009 after a few years hyping up her University aspirations. While there she still talked about to the press and in interviews. She lasted until the fall of 2010 even though she said that same fall she would not give up her college experience for anything. She left to go film Perks and model for Lancôme promoting a celebrity fragrance she spoke out against months earlier. She also was quoted as saying she was against taking teenage roles like the one in Perks. She completed a year in a half at Brown. She did not go back to school until the fall of 2011 but in Oxford (Worcester college) apparently on a study abroad program in her home country. However Brown's policy stated students must do two years at Brown before they are eligible. I documented this all in another post. She completed the fall 2011 requirements at Oxford. She left in the spring of 2012 to film Bling Ring even though she said she was focusing solely on her studies. She never completed her one year study abroad program. She completed two years of college at this point. She did not go back to Brown until the spring of 2013 apparently doing a Brown independent study program from her NYC apartment.

From snitchseeker.com September 2012, "Amazing. So you’re going back to school? I have one semester left, which I’ll go back in January to do, probably at Brown. Brown is great because they offer independent study programs, and there are lots of different options, which is one of the reasons I chose it."

Ok she has one semester left. There is no better person to say how long someone has left at college like the person going. They know their classes and credit situation better than you, me or any journalist. You heard it here. She has one semester left.

From entertainmentwise.com August 2012, "Emma Watson has postponed her return to Brown University in order to concentrate on her film career, sources have confirmed. But will the successful 'Harry Potter' actress ever decide to return to her studies? Brown University have confirmed that Emma Watson, who was famously subjected to bullying on campus, is on leave for the time being - but they have not yet revealed if she will return, or how she will make up her missed study time. A spokesman for Emma Watson, however, assures fans that the starlet WILL return to the university in early 2013: "Her plan is to resume her studies in January in order to complete her last semester before graduation. Brown has been very flexible regarding her filming commitments."

Ok it is settled. She has one semester left. Emma said it, and so did her spokesperson. All she has to do is go one more semester and she'll have that degree like she said. This is money in the bank. She'll be there in the Spring of 2013, and we'll see her getting a diploma at graduation.

From dailyrecord.co.uk Cannes May 2013,"While other kids would be, well, kids in a sweet shop at such fame and fortune at an early age, Emma has always, like her character Hermione in Harry Potter, been well-grounded. Rather than being happy with an acting career, she went to Brown University in Rhode Island, US. Smiling, she said: “I just finished my semester. I am on holiday now."

Wait!? If she did a semester then why isn't she done like she said she would be? She said it and even her spokesperson. Are you going to tell me she did not how many classes she had left? Is that going to be the excuse?

From entertainmentwise.com June 2013, "Emma Watson might be busy promoting two movies, This Is The End and Bling Ring, but the actress has admitted she'll be stepping away from acting for a while to return to Brown University to continue her studies. The 23-year-old, who recently wowed at the Cannes Film Festival with her stylish and chic fashion choices, has revealed in a new interview that she'll be heading back to the Ivy League university to finish off the English degree she put on hold in 2011, following claims of bullying."

It's the same website that reported last year she had one more semester left, and you'd think they would report what they said last year just to keep things honest and the readers properly informed to the facts. Nope! apparently that's not how the entertainment media works. It's not like the regular press where they fact check and make sure their keeping public figures honest.

From usatoday.com June 2013, "This fall, Emma Watson is heading back to Brown University to complete three more classes, and graduate. She's justifiably proud of finishing what she started. "I'm really close," she says."

I have feeling come January 2014 there will be reports of her putting off studies again to film a movie. Then we'll go through the cycle of her getting praise for putting her education first over her acting career. I don't get that. Putting your studies first is staying at school to study. I look at it as slap in the face of every college student that busts their ass to get their degree because they need it. She doesn't need it, but what she does need is praise for it. I don't think she even went to Brown the spring of 2013 because where are the usual photos from paparazzi and tweets from students verifying she is indeed studying at Brown? In the spring she's been photographed in LA, London and New York but not Providence.

So I guess she's doing the independent study program like she said? Well isn't that ruining her wonderful college experience she bragged about, and that desire she said she had to be a normal college student? She loved Brown but left? She was getting a normal college experience but is now settling for an independent study program? One thing is for certain. Whatever happened at Brown that made her run, it's still keeping her away because she's not physically been in Providence since the end of 2010. If she does physically go back to Brown in the fall that would be after her 2009 freshman class that just graduated. That's awfully peculiar if that happens because it would seem she waited for them to graduate before returning.

She's lied and spun so much it's hard to keep up. She did it to evade any criticism. She even had her lawyers send letters to entertainment outlets asking them to respect her privacy at school. That's strange because she was the one putting it all out there. She even tweeted a pic of herself on her first day at (Oxford) Worcester. She hyped up her education for years and even while there. Then she abruptly leaves making up all these excuses from having to finish filming Harry Potter to her grades to being too famous to blaming Warner Brothers. It contradicted everything she said prior. Harry Potter was finished filming and all she had left were premieres, she said at Brown they were leaving her alone and she found a place where she belongs, and she even praised Warner Brothers for being accommodating with her school scheduling. As for the grades well that's just something for people say well that makes sense because you want to get good grades. It was bullshit to be honest. With Bling Ring she just up and left Worcester, and was at least honest in that situation even though that action contradicted her statement of "going to focus solely on her studies".  

Emma Watson in 'Queen of the Tearling'

From mtv.com June 2013, "Watson will reteam with Warner Bros. and "Harry Potter" producer David Heyman for the big-screen adaptation of Erika Johansen's debut novel "Queen of the Tearling," Variety reports. The fantasy epic was purchased by publisher HarperCollins in February and is slated for a 2014 release. The trilogy is described as a "female-oriented 'Game of Thrones,' " and is set 300 years after a mysterious environmental calamity. The narrative focuses on 19-year-old princess Kelsea Glynn, who must defeat the Red Queen to reclaim her deceased mother's throne in the kingdom of the Tearling. According to a statement from her publisher, the idea for the book came to Johansen in a dream and was further inspired by a television appearance by then-Senator Barack Obama. Warner Bros. has yet to set a writer or director for the project, which Watson will executive produce."

Well another flip flop for Emma Watson.

From justjared.com June 2012, “The 22-year-old English actress recently was asked by a fan what types of movie roles she’s drawn to. “I am definitely staying away from blockbuster franchises for a while! In terms of the type of parts I am drawn to, I need to be interested in the role, and who I would be working with,” Emma wrote on her official website. “The director’s vision is key,” she added. “Sometimes what’s on the page isn’t always representative of what a piece can ultimately become and a great director can take a good script to another level and make it incredible"

She said the same thing a year earlier but right before the first quote she took on the Noah role.

From iheartwatson.net  July 2011, "The actress also said that she would like to act in a low-budget film to experience something different. She added: “I want to concentrate on smaller films from now on. I feel like I’ve got the blockbuster box well and truly ticked for the time being.” Speaking about her role in the new film The Perks of Being a Wallflower, she said: “I got to be funny, which was very exciting for me. The budget was miniscule and there wasn’t a single special effect."

I know, she just changed her mind, right? It would have nothing due to the fact no one wanted her for a blockbuster or anything, right? Of course she would want to stay away from blockbuster franchises and movies with special effects when all she is receiving is supporting roles in at best movies that could be made for television. Why leave two Universities like she did when apparently her education was so important to her. Now she wants to do blockbusters. How convenient, lol. So she wants to work with people with a good vision. Or how about people that can hand her roles without having to audition for them based off Harry Potter and an image she could shed doing risqué roles where people will pay to see her get her sexy on?

She did this with Lancôme. She said in November of 2010 she did not understand the celebrity fragrance thing, but what does she do 4 months later? She signs on to be the face of Lancôme with the very first promotion she pushes is a celebrity fragrance she bragged she got to pick the scent and everything else. At the same time she said the fragrance thing she said school was very important to her and she would not give it for anything, and added in another interview she would be naïve to separate herself from the Hermione role. So what does she do? She leaves college to film Perks to play Sam, and her very next film she's playing badass Nicki in Bling Ring leaving another University to do it even though a little before that she went on how hard it is for her to play badass in photo-shoots. You know playing the little miss innocent routine to go along with her studious image that is nothing but that an image to separate herself from actresses that are better than she is. She's done this with a lot of things actually. I'm just throwing out examples. You want the quotes for what I said I'll give them to you in comments with sources, or just go through my blog because you'll find them and many more.

This just proves she needs Harry Potter people to get her leading roles. She was supposedly rejected for GWTDT and Les Miserable. Hence the Pixie cut she felt so liberated with getting even though she said 7 months later she had to grow it back for other movie roles. Then why did you get it? I've always found that suspect because she talked about if for over two years like she was hiding the real reason she got it. In the beginning it was just a haircut, and then it turned into this big promotion. She would have had Your voice in my head but when Harry Potter director David Yates pulled out Warner Brothers replaced her with Emily Blunt. When I read she will executive produce this film I thought well she can thank David Heyman for that title because she would not even have this role if it were not for him, and if she did she would not be an executive producer. She has not laid a foundation of success to even covet such a position on a blockbuster movie franchise. Emma claims not to be confident with her acting, but here she is as an executive producer, lol? You'd have to a huge stan not to see this is what's going on. If he pulls out for anyone reason I don't think she will be attached to this film.

If you look at it Perks and Bling Ring wanted her for her Harry Potter fan base because they will pay money to see their small budget films. They'll make out at the end on the profit margin. Perks was Logan Lerman’s movie, not Emma’s but they promoted it as such to get butts in the seats, and in Bling Ring she’s third or fourth as a supporting actor even though she's been hyped as the face of the movie. And she only jumped on board with the Noah role because Dakota Fanning had to pull out due to scheduling conflicts with another movie. Noah's director Darren Aronofsky went with the Harry Potter fan base. When that movie is promoted expect them to use this to their advantage just like the others. They also did over promotion of her in My week with Marilyn where many critics wondered why she was even cast. Emma only attached herself to MWWM for name recognition in a Harvey Weinstein production. And she left Brown for three weeks to film it. This is the end movie is the same deal. She has a few cameo appearance, but they're making it out like she's a lead. You can also says this stuff for Burberry and Lancôme.

Of course her friends in the entertainment media will report it as a huge accomplishment. I've realized there are people that have to be on her pay roll for how and what they write about her. She does have them. DM did one other day that seemed like it was from the Sunday Style Times. There is never any fact checking, and it's always written in fan fiction form. Emma and her fans are going to milk this executive producer thing like she has a shelf of Oscars in her home. I can hear her quotes about it now, lol. She'll first down play it like she did not want it. The she'll get all pretentious and ostentatious on us as usual. That's how she normally does it. I can also hear her fans saying she already won a Oscar, lol. I know they're going to make a huge deal over this. The reality is it's being given to her, and it's not earned by someone that has proven her ability to be successful on screen as a lead actor.

Funny thing is, the very film franchise and character she used to bash as restricting her from doing other things is the same one allowing her acting career to continue. There would also be no Lancôme of Burberry without it. She's not getting spokesperson deals with brands for no other reason that Potter. She's not auditioning for roles and getting the part because of talent. She’s getting them because she’s that girl from Harry Potter. It’s a win/win. They profit of the Harry Potter fan base, and she gets to shed the Hermione image she built that she now hates. Making movies and fame is a business, and sometimes popularity wins over substance and quality.

And what does it tell you that there is a movie deal for 'Queen of the Tearling' before the books are even published. The expected publication date is 2014. And they're already hyping Emma in the movie. They're getting an early start on the bullshit.

Watch Emma get upset that she had to walk with Rupert instead of staying on producer David Heyman’s arm during the DH1 premiere in London.



Such a childish attitude. The point was because they were pushing the Hermione-Ron hook up. All she cared about was being photographed with David Heyman. Look how she tried to play off her attitude, lol. But wait, I thought she didn’t like attention? Seriously Emma is all an act. She is a good actress. Just not in films

From entertainmentwise.com May 2013, "It's called the impostor syndrome. It's almost like the better I do, the more my feeling of inadequacy actually increases," Watson told Rookie magazine "I'm just going, 'Any moment, someone's going to find out I'm a total fraud and that I don't deserve any of what I've achieved'."

I found out 

Emma Watson was teased mercilessly at school

This quote is from her acceptance speech of her Trailblazer award at the MTV movie awards

From goodreads.com April 2013, "I was completely the eager beaver in school. I was completely the girl in the front of the class who was the first person to put her hand up. And it’s not often not cool to be the person who puts herself out there and I’ve often gotten teased mercilessly."

Remember when there was a report Emma was bullied out of Brown and Emma quickly denied it? To refresh your memory Emma for many years leading up to her attendance at Brown and even after hyped the important of her education in every magazine. In the fall of 2010 she told Marie Claire magazine she gets amazing offers to act but she was staying put because she would not give up that experience for anything. She never attended the 2011 spring term despite a deleted tweet one week prior saying she was getting ready to head back. She hasn't physically been back to Brown since.

From usatoday.com April 23rd. 2011,  "Emma Watson has had enough of Brown. The Harry Potter star will be transferring to another school in the fall, her rep tells AP. (She didn't offer the name the new school.) The news comes in the wake of reports that the actress was bullied out of Brown University. According to the New York Daily News, Watson was a vocal and smart student, and when she got something right, her Ivy League classmates would respond with a quote from Harry Potter. The most popular choice was: "Three points for Gryffindor!" – a reference to the movie's dormitory system, and a congratulatory phrase in the films when a student got a correct answer. The Daily News also said that Watson was heckled at a September football game against Harvard by students shouted Harry Potter phrases at her. Watson's rep, Vanessa Davies, said there was no truth to the reports. She added that the star "has absolutely loved her time at Brown" and made many good friends there.

Here is the flip flop because Emma took to the press to deny that she was ever bullied

From sheknows.com April 2011, "Ms. Watson penned a simple and honest letter to her fans to clear up any misconceptions about her semester away from the Ivy League school. "I have never been bullied in my life and certainly never at Brown. I feel the need to say this because accusing Brown students of something as serious as bullying and this causing me to leave seems beyond unfair." The rumor started when the New York Daily News reported Emma Watson faced verbal harassment on campus with fellow students shouting, "Three points from Gryffindor!"

Bullying and teasing are the same thing. They are interchangeable descriptions. So the question is was she lying when she denying the bullying rumors at Brown, or is she lying during her acceptance speech for her Trailblazer? Seems to be she cut and ran from Brown as fast as she could because she has yet to return to Providence. She's made every excuse since them from blaming her fame to filming of Harry Potter even though she referenced her fame many time before and during her time at Brown, and Harry Potter was finished filming the summer before her last semester at Brown.

She knew the entire MTV world, her demographic target audience, would be watching. I would not doubt she thought how can I make an uplifting speech during my acceptance of the Trailblazer. I thought it had a Ann Hathaway beforehand scripted speech vibe to it. It would be a perfect opportunity to school some brownie points with them. Pull them in saying how much you were teased by meanies, and then end it like she did with you can accomplish anything you put your mind to. That's the stuff that sucks in the naïve and impressionable even though it's cliché and been said a million times before.

Emma Watson is weirded out by designer bags

From theage.com.au May 2013 (Cannes), "Despite being part of that narrative, she found Los Angeles "like an alien planet" when she first went there. "I mean, I grew up in the countryside in a small town in England. It really is just like polar opposites." If anything, working on The Bling Ring has only confirmed her sense that she belongs to a different world. "I think the film has scarred me slightly," she said. "I just see a designer bag and – I can't even carry one any more. It just weirds me out."

Here are few photos from August 2012 to April 2013 after Bling Ring where she is carrying designer hand bags.



From dailymail.co.uk June 2013, "She told the Daily Mail : "I probably own about eight pairs of shoes, max. I get lent all of these beautiful clothes, but a bit like Cinderella they all go back at midnight and I just go home and put my jeans on. I haven't got wardrobes full of gowns." The 23-year-old star - who turned down the opportunity to play Cinderella in a Disney version of the tale, which is currently in production - added going out in normal clothes helps her to stay incognito. She added: ''I don't carry a designer handbag. I think people recognise me less when I don't wear make-up. I just try to be as low-key as I can possibly manage when I'm not working. - contactmusic.com" Really? From style.com April 2012, “I’ve carried a Mulberry bag for a long time and they’ve always been quite supportive. And they’re fun! I love what they’ve been doing recently, and I love these monsters”

Looks to me in the photos above she is carrying designer bags and she's not walking a red carpet. You really think the jeans she goes home to later are the cheap kind the rest of us wear? and I truly doubt she only own 8 pair of shoes. Check this Emma Watson fashion page out.

Bling Ring production was April 2012 to May 2012. I left out two photos from June 2012 and July 2012 of her carrying a designer bag because I was not sure what brand they were, but do you really need to conformation or even take a wild guess that those bags were designer brands? This girl is not going to go cheap with anything she wears or accessorizes with. If you go to a website dedicated to her fashion you'd be amazed that the casual look she's tended to be photographed in is a really expensive one. We're talking stuff like sweaters that cost 498.00, boots that are 800.00, and jeans that are 150.00. She spares no expense to have the finest things.

But anyway this is a blatant lie. The notion she can't carry a designer bag anymore is rubbish. Yes she can. Yes she did. I just showed you. There is no excuse for her lying like this. Why would anyone care if she carries a designer bag? I could careless. I only care that she lies about things that are not true. She can carry two designer bags at a time if she wants. Whatever, lol. Just don't say that you don't do things when you do. She has this history of doing this ,and I've proven it time and time again. She obviously knows what she said is not true, and she says it anyway because she knows those are the types of things that people end liking her for, but the reality is none of it is honest if you do your research. Emma's public persona/image is a contrived lie she knowingly engages in.

To refresh your memory in 2011 I did a post you can check out here where Emma claimed to not carry designer handbags or where big sunglasses when she's not being "Emma Watson" (whatever that means) and I showed you pictures of this not being true. Then months later she admitted at Mulberry event to always carrying their designer bags and you can read that post here.

What if I told you days after the quote from this years Cannes where she said she can't carry designer bags anymore, she was photographed in NYC with what looks to be a designer bag, lol.



The original quote about carrying designer bags



Look at the dates. She was seen out wearing big sunglasses and carrying a designer bag before the quote was published, lol. She should just say sometimes she does, and sometimes she doesn’t, but she makes it out like she’s better than other Hollywood actresses that do. You can find loads of photos of Emma wearing big sunglasses and carrying designer hand bags when she is not working. It's really no big deal that she does. Wear all the big sunglasses and carry designer bags all you want. She desperately wants you to like her, and to think she's just like you. I can't stand people like that.

Just a few random photos

Emma Watson is uncomfortable in hot pants and leather jackets

I have new stuff coming but this is one post I never got around to do before I stopped doing this blog back in September. I actually missed this quote, and someone back then reminded me about it, but I was so deep in other posts I never got around to it. I added the quote to a Bling Ring post I did about her tramp stamp but that was way after the fact of posting it.

From iheartwatson.net August 2011, “How did you find your fashion voice? ‘Sometimes on photo shoots, 'This is too sexy for me. This isn’t my thing. A rock-and-roll biker jacket and hot pants is not who I am. I’ve learned to politely say, 'Look, I’m sorry. I’m not comfortable.'”



The quote in from August 2011 seventeen magazine interview

Top left photo is from the set of Bling Ring in 2012
The next is from a fashion shoot for Elle in 2009
The next one is really short shorts for Marie Claire in 2010
The far right is from a photo shoot in 2012
The bottom left is enjoying the night life in LA in 2012
The bottom middle is her second outfit (the first one she had many nips slips) from Glastonbury music festival in 2010
The next one is from London in 2010
The bottom right is another one from LA

And those are not it

And please don't give me she changed her mind, or she out grew the idea that she was no longer uncomfortable wearing hot pants and a biker jacket. The 2010 Glastonbury photo proved she lied. I did not add the photos of her in mini dresses wearing leather jackets like the Tribeca film festival and GQ men awards in 2012. So she's comfortable wearing leather jackets, and in fact you can go back as far as 2008 you will find she has worn leather jackets at a few events. Beyond that she has always had sexy photo shoots here and there when that's exactly what she was going for. The more recent ones like W Magazine, Glamour magazine and GQ magazine is where it's more apparent.

Emma, as always deceives and misrepresents her morals and convictions so you'll like her. She's built this image up about herself as being high and above other females as she slut shames her way by being a contradictive hypocrite on the very things she says she is against. She's done it with make-up, wearing mini dresses, etc and etc. I've covered them on this blog.  Now tell me, why would she say this is 2011 when in 2010 she wore hot pants, and in 2009 she posed in hot pants and jacket that in style seems like a leather jacket? I don't care she wears hot pants and leather jackets. She can wear them everyday. What I do care about is her lying that she doesn't when she does.

UPDATE:  Added June 13th, 2013. Thanks to paparazzi.


 

Emma Watson at it again

Before I start I'd like to say since the beginning of this blog in February 2011 I have been stating she's fake. I've always said there is the public Emma and then there is the private one. And every step of the way I've been called every name you can think of by her fans. She preaches to people that they need to be honest and stay true to who they are while she lies. That's the point I tried to make in every post I ever made. It was to show you what you see is not what you always get, and that she deceives you on purpose. I'll just say she is very skilled at coming off sincere and honest. She is a master manipulator and she knows how to play the game.

When I read these late 2012 quotes that I was not able to post since I stopped doing this blog at that time, and these current 2013 quotes I get a sense she knows about this blog. I'm pretty sure after 1.2 million hits and the many past threats I received from her fans saying they "were going to tell on me" (LOL) that she is very aware of this blog. Somebody probably sent her a letter, contacted her management team or tweeted her or something. There are even a few other newer quotes where she says she knows she sometimes sounds like bullshit and one on being ostentatious. All things I have said here consistently. Where else has that stuff ever been said but here?

From dangerous-emma-watson.tumblr.com February 2013, “Let’s say there’s a side of me, the one represented in the media, that does not match who I really am in private life. People think they know me because for years I have seen the movies and read about me in the papers. They like the feeling that we grew up together. But I have a personal dimension that no one knows.”

Wow here is some truth on her part. Pinch me! Did hell just freeze over? The thing about people who deceive others is once in a while you'll get some truth from them, but the key is to figure out what time they are actually telling it. And I understand what she means by people think they know her. They think she is Hermione. They've always confused her with that fictional character. But you know what it's not their fault. Emma said many times she was just like Hermione. The last five years of Potter she laid that notion on pretty thick. That's and she's done every magazine you can think of while being interviewed many times over. Way many more than Dan or Rupert. She's did a lot of self promotion during the last few years of Potter, and it's continued to this day.

From peoplemagazine.co. January 2013, “Emma Watson has accepted that she “can’t control” her public image. The actress explained she had to learn to deal with having two personas: her true self and the famous starlet. Having shot to fame as Hermione Granger in the hugely popular Harry Potter franchise, the 22-year-old has transformed herself from child star to businesswoman with numerous hit movies, fashion and beauty campaigns under her belt. “It kind of does feel that way [like I am a brand]. That’s just something I’ve come to realise. That there’s a public persona… and I have to accept that I can’t control that persona, because it’s created by other people. I just keep in mind that that’s what they’re projecting onto me,” she told the latest issue of UK magazine Marie Claire. “I try to remember that there are two separate people: the professional me and the private me. Both different. I try to draw a line between the two.”

She can't control her image? She owns it. She created it. Her image come from the very interviews she does with the things she says. That's where the people get their perceptions of her from. Her image also comes from years of saying she is just like Hermione Granger. It's like all of the attributes of a fictional character was hers for the longest time but now that the franchise has ended so has all her comparisons to Hermione. The only person that created it was her. There is no one else to blame but her. And the word "brand" she used I labeled Emma that in 2011. Not to get into specifics but I did a post on it here. No one is projecting anything on her. She is projecting herself on others. It's unfair and wrong that she's blaming people that are reacting and writing to what she puts out there. Would a painter blame the art exhibit for any negative response received over their painting?

From usatoday.com September 2012, “When you’re playing someone else and you’re playing a public persona for the media, you almost lose your own identity and who you are. Being able to go to school and be around people who don’t work in this industry was a big part in helping me stay somewhat sane. I made a lot of sacrifices. It was really hard to get it done. But I’m so glad I did.”

"Playing a public persona" for the media? This means no one is projecting anything on her. She's blaming others for "projecting" things onto her while she's purposely deceiving everyone as to who she is. She created this perfect media driven image of herself that is not true. Did Dan and Rupert go around saying they are just like Harry and Ron? No! Emma's entire good girl public persona is Hermione driven. Gary Oldman said, "Any actor who tells you that they have become the people they play, unless they’re clearly diagnosed as a schizophrenic, is bullshitting you.” I don't think Emma is crazy, but I think she might have mind fucked herself with always saying she is just like Hermione. As for the bullshitting part, yeah, Emma is a huge bullshitter.

Don't worry she agrees, and yet again taking phrases I have used to describe her.

From watsonlove.tumblr.com rookiemag June 2013, "Sometimes I hear myself in interviews and I feel like I’m in that skit from Extras where one actor is taking the piss out of celebrities who are like, “I’m so normal! Look at me being really normal, doing all of this normal stuff!” You can take it to a point where it’s like, “Well, yeah, my life is kind of weird and I can’t pretend that I live exactly like everyone else,” because it’s an extraordinary set of circumstances to be under, so it’s kind of finding that middle ground. But yeah—sometimes I hear myself back and I’m like, “This just sounds like bullshit."

From dailymail.co.uk June 2013, "The actress, too, has different sides, as most famous thespians must. ‘I think you have to have a bit of public-private you, to stay sane,’ she says. ‘I try my best to be as authentic as I can, without feeling so vulnerable that I don’t ever want to leave my hotel suite. It’s about finding that balance. I try to be real, but I also understand there’s a distinction between the me that walks red carpets, and the me that is just myself, at home.’

Emma has caged herself. She desperately wants to be looked at someone she is not, but at the same time she wants to be who she really is. What's wrong with being authentic all the time? Why don't she want the public to see her true self? Maybe because they'll like the media representation of her a lot better. She said in 2011, ""In terms of a role model the cleanest way to live as a human and artist is to be true to yourself." Exactly and I agree 100% with her there, but Emma shows time and time again she does not practice what she preaches. This is where wanting to be looked at as someone you are not comes to play. She wants the praise and to be looked up to, but she wants none of teh responsibility that comes with it. Those types of quotes make people really like her. She has loads of these type of quotes, and many others different ones spouting virtuoso things filled with idealistic convictions of which she fails to adhere to. Politicians do the same exact thing so you'll vote for them. She does this so you'll like her, and spend money on whatever she is promoting.

From rookiemag.com June 2013, "Similar to you, I used to try to hide what I was doing, and I would end up in these awkward positions where I would have to go and do something [for work] but I would say I was doing something else. I would try to hide that I had a car picking me up—I would hide the car around the corner so that people would think I was walking. All of these elaborate kinds of schemes to pretend I was like everyone else.”

This is the point I've made in the past time and time again at this blog. She lies, schemes and does whatever she can to make you think she is something she is not. If she is going to lie about stuff like this then what else has she been lying about? These are planned, well thought out and calculated lies. It's not like the lies people tell when they're caught off guard. It goes deeper than just hiding a car around the corner. What else has she been scheming? I say a lot of things, and you can find them on this blog. She said in 2011, "Never have anything to hide or lose." Yet she is the one hiding things because she's afraid she'll lose the perception of perfection and that girl next door image that people have of her that she created.

I have new flip flops, deceptions, hypocrisy coming up. As long as I am motivated to do this blog I will continue to post. I consider this a hobby, and like so many hobbies, you can get bored with them. At anytime I might stop so you can always go check out emma-what-son.tumblr.  

Meet the Real Emma Watson blog update

If anyone still comes to this blog that used to, and not because they searched for Emma/sex on the Internet and mine came up for her nude fake, nip slips, etc.......

After a 9 month retirement I might be coming back to this blog. That out of the blue post a few weeks ago telling you to check out emma-what-son.tumblr sucked me back in. I was not expecting their tumblr page to pop up on my personal tumblr wall. The more I read what they had to post the more I started to remember how fun it was to point out her bullshit. That's all it has ever been. I guess when you idolize a celebrity so much you think someone not liking them has some sort of sinister motive behind it. I'm still thinking about coming back here to this blog full time. But I have some thoughts.

If I come back here I know I will have to take Watson fan abuse. I will be called every name including stalker, creep and implying I am a danger to her well being. I understand that's part of the territory even though it sucks to hear that. A wet napkin is more dangerous than I am. I always felt like an atheist dealing with Christians when it came to her fans. They just don't want to listen to reason. That's why I stopped when I came back from vacation, and another why I started to moderate comments many months earlier. That and they were fouling up the good debates we all were having. So when I went on holiday for a week in September it was peaceful and serene with no whining, and when I came back I decided just to quit but did not want to let down the supportive followers that loved to comment. When I came back I had a hard time getting back into an Echee mindset. It just felt stupid, and I thought why did I waste my time. It was like pushing a heavy rock up a steep hill with everything working against you. I eventually quit after posting something in October and then an official good-bye in December. I thought I was done, but after reading her new bullshit the fire has begun to burn again.

So here I am, like I said, sucked back in contemplating a return. I guess I am do for criticism for saying I was done, and then thinking about making a return. Let me know, if anyone is still around, in comments below if you think it is a good or bad idea. Maybe I killed this blog completely by leaving how I did? But anyways I'll check back in a few days.

Emma Watson: check out http://emma-what-son.tumblr.com

Link: http://emma-what-son.tumblr.com/

This person, whoever it is, has taken over with the context of this blog. I came across this page when it popped up on my tumblr wall after it was posted by one of my followers. This is not me. I DO NOT run that tumblr page. Some Emma loons think that it is, but it is not. I still think it is important that emma watson does not get away with her lying, hypocrisy and contradicting. I'm just advertising this page for that person. Someone needs to keep things honest!

So go check out http://emma-what-son.tumblr.com/ if you need to fill the void this blog has left you.


 

Happy Christmas Emma Watson fans and non-Emma Watson fans

This blog is dead. I'm not coming back. I have no clue what is going on with Emma Watson from a professional, dating or pretty little liar stand point. I don't care. That moment in my life have passed. Today was the first day in over two months I googled anything on Emma. It was for shits and giggles but thankfully my giggles didn't make me shit. Call this boredom and a little bit of weird nostalgia at the moment. Looking back to the two years of this blog I call myself an idiot for wasting my time but it was what it was. I know I looked obsessed at times but you cannot refute the evidence and sources. I did not call her names outside of fake. I stuck to the facts as she put them out there. Empirical date and deductive reasoning goes along way. I looked at it like putting together a puzzle. I love sleuth and detective work. You're not always right but your not always completely wrong and I think I'm pretty damn close to winner winner chicken dinner if you get that slang. It was not that difficult to do actually and my posts took 10 to 15 minutes to construct if you knew where all the information was.

So I took to the net today as I just mentioned and I read some things and I was like, eh, same old little pretentious and ostentatious girl with her deceptions, hypocrisy and contradictions. Her fans still buy it and the casual readers do just the same. They are not putting two and two together because of ignorance (casual readers) and cognitive dissonance (emma loons). They are still making excuses for her out of the stupidest arguments. I did notice one quote recently from the PoBaWF promotion where she said she is a lot more honest now. Well well well I thought she was always honest and stayed true to herself like she preached? I still think the girl is a piece of work and one fake ass celebrity that either lives in her own head or is so choreographed and scripted she can't keep up with it all. Maybe it's a little bit of everything sprinkled here and there. She seems to be one complicated and confusing person. Maybe a little bi-polar with an identity complex. I don't know for sure but I've always had that idea about her with how much she flip and flops all the time. Well if it wasn't PR motivated all the time. Of which many signs point to her being a media whore.

Continuing this blog would have been like beating a dead horse. She will recycle lies and make new one up all for her image just so she can make some money and feed her huge ego thinking she's just like Audrey Hepburn. The girl has had everything handed to her. She famous, wealthy, pretty and white. She has the media and most onlookers wrapped around her pretty little lying finger. The girl next door look can do that. If she looked like Kelly Osborne she'd be called out but since she is truly a lovely looking lady she gets a pass. But anyway she still finds things to whine like she's lived this stunted unfulfilled life. When it comes down to it Emma is a overly privileged girl from a modest middle class family that never had to struggle her entire life for anything and became even luckier when she was chosen to be in Harry Potter. But still she is woe is me Watson. I always found that annoying and it was even worse when I caught her in deceptions, contradiction and hypocrisy. It was a slap in the face to hard working people everywhere. If it were not for that I would have not cared. I would have been like 'good for her' with a smile. I used to when I was dumb about her but once I started reading and paying attention that smile turned upside down.

Finally to end my little stroll down why the hell did I ever care lane I also went to the some old Emma Watson forums and websites to read how obsessed her fans still are. I'm sorry but I couldn't live like that or continue on and on like it was breathing. I never quite grasped the god like admiration people put on celebrities with the stalking, posting of private pictures and downright vicious of fans in the defense of people that don't even know they exist, or probably even care. You might as well erect statues and places of worship to them. You make them out to be this golden calf like the fictional story of Moses and the ten commandments. If you studied psychology, anthropology and theology you'd see the connection and you'd understand my point with this. It's very similar practices. You buy into the hype, movie magic and physical and commerical attraction of these people.  As for me I don't need golden calves to live my life or need anyone to look up too. I just need books to read and things to learn and that will never stop but this blog has.

Anyway Happy Christmas to you all, goodbye and good luck =)
 

Let’s talk about Emma Watson

I have not had the urge until now to blog. A lot of that was because of her Glamour and t-magazine, lies, hypocrisy and contradictions. It actually turned me off from continuing. The girl gets away with it. It's an endless cycle of let's ignore her bullshit but praise her. I started getting a real bad itch last night. I heard quote from a radio interview (posted on youtube) where she said Perks made her do all these things she was uncomfortable with. I sat there in amazement because she read the script and book before the movie. She knew what she was getting into. She wanted Perks for the reason of separating herself from the Hermione role. She does have a lot of nerve to talk how she does with always making herself out as an innocent victim. She knew exactly what she was doing and wants risque roles. To lie like this is despicable. That's what started the itch. I wasn't even searching for anything on her. It came up on my youtube and curious me clicked to see what was going on.

To set things straight the Lets talk about Emma Watson tumblr was me. I stopped that when I stopped doing this blog over a month ago. I did that as an experiment. I posted regular photos of Emma but placed her contradictions, hypocrisy and deceptions quotes below to see what response I would get. People were confused if I liked her or not but loved the photos. I still got a lot of hate for it even though I did no respond like I normally do with all the "echee says" lingo. I stuck to what she said and that's all. People are blinded by her looks to the point they can't see what's wrong with her. I've said that time and time again. I've accepted it is what it is because those people will never be torn away from their trance. Beauty forgives all transgressions and flaws that other people would not be forgiven for. Not many of us can look past what someone looks like.

On another note it's been over a month since I came to this blog or really read anything on her other than what I said above regarding youtube. I am out of the loop. I don't know where to start. That's a discouragement in itself to continue. Maybe someone can tell me what's been going on. However I don't know if I will keep on going. Maybe this post will restart the blog. I have to admit I don't feel the same way I did before. I used to have feelings of strong annoyance towards her. Now it's nothing but thoughts. I had a lot of time to put in real thought outside this blog. I completely separated myself from what I was doing here. Maybe that's a good thing because that annoyance clouded some things. I do feel the same way when it comes to her being fake and living in her own head but in a weird way I feel sorry for her. Not because she's a victim. She's someone who needs to be disingenuous to be liked. Outside her looks there is nothing special about her. For celebrity standards she's a dud. She's lucky she was part of Harry Potter and had the role she did. It's not because of the pressure of being a celebrity or anything remotely close to that example. Emma is that girl that has been handed everything but unfortunately lacks the personality and character to respect, appreciate and have perspective about it.

When I came back I lost the fervour to do this blog. Now I don't know how I feel about doing it. I kind of want to but then I kind of don't. I don't hate Emma or am I jealous. The evidence I've placed speak for themselves. The girl is fake and full of herself. She has everything one could ever want but she chooses to lie, contradict and be a hypocrite. It's all on purpose. It's for her image. These are not honest mistakes. We all have degrees of honest contradiction or hypocrisy which is natural but she plays these angles. She plays the fame game. Anyone with an open mind can tell she's not being honest. Though not everyone is a liar to the degree she is. We all have lied about something but how many of us has lied about who we are as person? That's what gets me about her. We all have flaws but she has enough of these moments where you can tell she's like this on purpose. She's simply not an honest celebrity. As I've stated before this blog is about her celebrity side but now I have a strong suspicion this trait of deception is also within her personal life. I don't think Emma the celebrity is much different than Emma the private person.

Today was the first day I wanted to sign on. I had a nice holiday/vacation. I originally said I wouldn't be back for a week but it ended up pulling me away from this blog for over a month. I had great moments of clarity under the back drop of the luminous night sky. The separation of human from technology is glorious. Technology destroys the person's spiritual ability to see the world as something different than they are accustomed to. Sitting under the cosmos makes you feel very small. The billions of stars and galaxies shining back at you (well not all of them) makes you realize how small and insignificant we all are. It's really beautiful. The way the sun sets with all the orange, yellow, purple, red and grey colors sprawling across the horizon is awe inspiring. The quiet was very peaceful.

Btw I am trying to figure out this new blogger moderator thing (they changed the entire format from my end) and my last post as I was trying to delete spam I accidentally deleted 35 of your comments of which some were there before I left. Thanks for missing me and wanting new posts. We'll see if I can blog like I used to after I catch up with what I missed. Right now I don't know but I do appreciate your comments from when i was gone. That's why I made this post.

Emma Watson is the master of deception and spin

WHAT SHE SAYS NOW: From snitchseeker.com September 2012, "But Emma hasn’t let that effect her life choices. In 2009 she enrolled at Brown university in the US to study European woman’s history and drama, trying her best to ignore the paparazzi following her around campus, and picked a poignant high-school drama, The Perks of being a Wallflower (see out review page 217) as her first post-potter project."It’s not some wild break away from Harry Potter," She explains from her JFK-bound car in New York. "Because I don’t really want to get away from Harry Potter - I’ve never seen it as shackle."

WHAT SHE SAID THEN: From indianexpress.com Nov 2010, "People keep saying to me, 'So this is the end, how do you feel about it being the end?' And I'm like, 'It really doesn't feel that to me.' It feels like the beginning. It's actually really an exciting time for me rather than this kind of the end. I can't stand everyone calling it the end. I'm 20 years old. Seriously. It feels like I've been handed my life back, like I've been let off a leash," said Watson.

Echee says: Leash and shackle; it's the same thing. They both restrict movement and your abilities to move. I could post more quotes of her saying similar things and saying she loves not having Potter anymore because she was restricted from taking on other project. I think this single quote pretty much sums up she did feel like she was shackled. More quotes click these posts called Emma Watson says being famous is hard and  Emma had no control over her life. Those are just two.

WHAT SHE SAYS NOW: From usmagazine.com September 2012, "Emma also offered a little insight on her new role in The Perks Of Being A Wallflower, saying it was the realisation she needed that acting is the right career for her - despite 10 years of Potter life. She continued: ‘Making this movie was so pivotal for me because I realised I do really want to be an actress, which wasn’t something I fully knew, since Harry Potter was such a singular experience."

WHAT SHE SAID THEN: From telegraph.co.uk July 2007, "It's the first time I've been anything but Hermione. Pauline is headstrong, so in that way she is quite like Hermione, but she is not academic. In fact, she actually reminds me of myself as a child, much more than Hermione does. Pauline is utterly obsessed with being an actress and I was just like that when I was younger. I dreamt of it. I practised speeches in front of mirrors. Whenever there was a part at school, I went for it. I was probably a bit of a show-off in the sense that any chance to get up and be seen, I did it."

Echee says: Not much to say here. I did a post on this. Emma as usual is lying through her teeth. She's hyping up Perks making it sound dramatic. The fact is she dreamed of being actress as far back as she can remember. Check out the post I did called Emma clarifies her acting dreams for more quotes and bullshit on the part of Emma "stay true an honest as a person and artist" Watson.

WHAT SHE SAYS NOW: From ewcoffeebreak.wordpress.com September 2012 Glamour magazine, "The problem with a beautiful, intelligent and accomplished young woman like Emma is that, while she suffers from the same vulnerabilities as any girl, there’s no inner torment or dysfunction there for people to pick at. So she keeps calm and carries on, with plans to return to Brown in January ("I made such nice friends there"), and invites her friends to join her on the set of upcoming film Noah in iceland - her destination today - when she gets lonely."

WHAT SHE JUST SAID: From firstpost.com August 2012, London, Aug 18 (IANS) Actress Emma Watson reveals that her initial years at the university “weren’t easy” because she couldn’t spend a lot of time with a solid group of friends. The 22-year-old actress began her studies at Brown University in 2009 and admits that the American establishment was tough. “My first two years at Brown weren’t easy, not because I was bullied or because anyone gave me a particularly hard time, but just because, you know, without the collegiate system… and at Brown everyone does completely different things and very much chooses their own path, which is great, but it’s also much more difficult, too. You’re not with a group of people all the time at one time,” she told T: The New York Times Style Magazine. (First two years? She was there for a year in a half)

Echee says: My God she said something recently in t-magazine that was different. I did not post the quote from this same interview where she was asked if she made friends at Brown and she declined to comment sighting privacy and personal reasons. I have the scan from ONTD. She used to love to talk about her friends from Brown. Well when she was at Brown. I bet these friends are the imaginary type. Aww the poor girl gets lonely. 1 2 3 AWWWWW!! Click here for that post and just go to my University posts on the right screen if you need more input about her lovely time at Brown that is now a dramatic boohoo of a time.

WHAT SHE SAYS NOW: From glamour.com September 2012 Glamour magazine, "Do you have a stylist? “Yeah, I have to at this point. When I was younger, I used to do it all myself, but I’ve had to get help because it’s gotten to a stage where I can’t show up in my Converses or whatever I bought from High Street."

WHAT SHE SAID THEN: From inquisitr.com March 2012, "The 21-year-old Harry Potter star – who has appeared in advertising campaigns for Burberry in the past, including a billboard campaign alongside her younger brother in 2009 – has always welcomed assistance from stylists but feels it’s the time to start making her own decisions when it comes to "what to wear." Watson explained: "I was fully game for, ‘Throw me in this, throw me in that’ but I’d like to develop my own sense of style and dress for myself.

Echee says: Ok when she was younger she used to do it all by herself and she needs help now. Go to the second quote and she did not do it all herself and she wants to dress for herself. What is the real story and why is it all ass backwards? So complicated but luckily I did posts on this. Emma's stylist is the real fashion icon, Emma Watson fashion icon by association and Emma Watson still using a stylist.

THE LIE: From celebrity-gossip.net September 2012, On not wanting to date another actor: "I try not to. It definitely makes me nervous. I haven’t tried to make others celebrity friends or date people who are in my industry, because it’s difficult and it can be really superficial."

THE TRUTH: Johnny Simmons (runner up: George Craig who acts/performs in music videos)


Echee says: LMFAO and you know not one entertainment media outlet is going, "Wait a moment?! But you dated Johnny Simmons and lied about it. Just like George Craig." I did many posts on this. To sum it up. Started off as a nature walk on location filming Perks, then a bar on location, then the MTV movie awards where it was reported he was stroking her butt and they kissed but it was a bad camera angle. That was after two weeks of filming. Then they were photographed in his home town of Dallas at a night club. Then there was the denial by Emma and her publicist saying they were only friends. Then she was in LA hanging out on his new movie set,  spotted at Kings Crossing in London, a publicity stunt leaked getaway in Paris and then sitting on his lap in NYC in September. One month later she ended up being with her current boyfriend. Wow she had dating issues like for sure. Eh, I did many posts on this. This one should do. Emma found a man not terrified of her. More is under my dating guys posts on the right side with pictures of all I just said.

THE BULLSHIT: From celebrity-gossip.net September 2012 Glamour magazine, "On her physical qualities receiving positive attention as of late: "I was always the smart, nerdy one. People put you in boxes, and that was my box. So it's really nice [the compliments], but looks have never been something that I focused on or that people around me did. But I liked being nerdy one."

THE REALITY: Model for Burberry and Lancome. If she didn't focus on her looks she would have not done any of those things. If she never felt she was pretty she would have never done them and continue in magazine photo shoots. She's been using what she was born with. She's embraced her good looks. First she is an actress. Not a model or anything like that. That came later. She uses her looks with everything she does. The nerdy thing is more Hermione than it is Emma. They put her in that box because she claimed to live in that box. If she was not thought as a pretty little girl by JK Rowling she would have not got the part of Hermione. That is why she was cast. Anytime you pick up an article about her it is always saying how pretty she is. Even her fan fiction interviews that are clearly created by her PR team does this. Her looks have made her life. Her acting sucks. She's overrated because of her looks. If she were not as pretty and looked like a Kelly Osbourne she'd be hosting reality TV shows as well. It's a shallow world we reside. That's how it is. This daft quote in the same interview she's posing with half a boob showing. Emma just STFU please.

MADE ME LAUGH: From celebrity-gossip.net September 2012, "On seeing herself on-screen in 'Perks' as not-Hermione: "It was a pretty emotional experience! I have to say, I cried a lot the first time I watched it."

WHY: When you desperately want rid of something, like she does with the Hermione image, crying is not a emotion one would exhibit while watching it happen. Relief and joy would be the proper emotion. Unless you are a spoiled person that never had to deal with real hardship in life and when you don;t get your way like you normally do you cry. I think that pegs Emma real well. The amount of bullshit in that quote compared to how desperate she's been to shed Hermione is pretty high in such a short quote. I have quotes going back five years of her going it's really going to be hard to shed this image. At the same time as she grew older she's began to preach how modest she is and how upset she gets when photographers put her in sexy outfits in photo shoots. Then you see her in sexy outfits at strip clubs, move sets and photo shoots. She's done nothing but lie about her modesty bullshit. It was a cover to attempt to start sheding that image. She's like a politican about many things. Tells you what you want to hear and then does the opposite. We vote the same idiots in office all the time. Idiots think Emma is a role model. It's the same exact thing.  Eh, I got some modesty bullshit coming on her Glamour shoot I'll save for another post.  In the meantime listen to her talk about crying.

From iheartwatson.net Harper’s Bazaar UK: ‘Good Girl Gone Bad’ – August 2011, "My acting tutor said the hardest thing for me was to get angry. I almost broke down in tears when they tried to get me to be angry" From iheartwatson.net Harper’s Bazaar UK: August 2011, "I read the whole script in one sitting and it made me cry." From iheartwatson.net Seventeen Magazine: August 2011, "So I wouldn’t call, because I didn’t want to cry." From iheartwatson.net Vogue UK: December 2010, "In the end I had a break down. More like uncontrollably crying." From www.iheartwatson.net August 2011, "I read the whole script in one sitting and it made me cry … it deals with the issues that teenagers go through, the real ones, the scary ones that no one really wants to talk about."



From iheartwatson.net The Early Show: November 2005, "It’s funny, I find it easier to cry. But to laugh realistically, when they say laugh on cue, it’s really hard not to make it sound kind of fake."

Echee says: I don't think she cries as much as she says she does. It's a great sympathy ploy for readers. Beautiful girl that cries. Awwwww. She's so sweet. This goes with her modesty quotes and her claim she is shy and not attracted by fame or money. She so addicted to work when the reality is she is addicted to attention. She wants normalcy and anonymity but never stays away long enough to be forgotten, etc, etc. This is why she is the master of deception. Last part of the last quote says, "sound kind of fake" and she surely sounds fake to me. She's the little girl that always cries wolf. I don't believe her on anything she says about herself. Too much confliction, hypocrisy, contradiction and deception. 

I have more coming. This post has to end here. Her body obsession issues where she finally feels comfortable in her thin skin (this was after she dropped the weight she gained after Potter) , the hardest part of fame is people seeing past the hype when all she ever did was whine about anonymity, she does not drink but she's not sensble about it, her graduation talk which is bullshit, her amazement she was spotted at Cochella and her side boob photo shoot to name a few. She talked about her hair once more but I don't know. Like her education bullshit I am tired of posting on her hair cut from over two years ago. I made some of these updates in older posts.

Next week I wont be around. Too much going on. This will probaly be my last post until the following week.

Perks of being a Wallflower turning into the Emma Watson movie

From the-leaky-cauldron.org (Logan Lerman), "She’s great. She’s really a great person and easy to work with and a fantastic actress. [I am] a big fan of Harry Potter. Yeah, it’s really exciting to see her outside of the series and what she’s able to do. She’s not only pulling it off, but she’s blowing people away with her performance."

From ezra-miller.net (Ezra Miller), "I must’ve listened to each of the Jim Dale voice recordings of the Harry Potter books maybe like a couple hundred times each. And that means like putting in the hours everyday, and that’s what I did after school, was just like listen to those books on repeat. You know, here’s what it—here’s what I essentially believe. Here’s what— something that’s very exciting about Emma—truly being such a magical artist— is that, that book strikes a core of human beings all around—all over this world. Those books do for a very specific reason—which is that like, we all feel innately that we are capable of very, very, very wonderful, magical things and that’s not validated in this culture—in this society—and thus the, you know, the ration of people who are actually acting upon these abilities that we have I feel like gets smaller and smaller and—but, you know, the reality is that we have those capabilities and that, you know, Emma—who plays Hermione Granger— has those capabilities as an artist. She is what we look at and say ‘magician.’ [laughs] You know? She is that. So yeah, Harry Potter was important for me but fortunately it’s been—it hasn’t even crossed my mind at any point working with Emma. No, not even for a second because she is quite her own entity"

From mtv.com (Nina Dobrev), "This has been a really great choice for Emma, and the role couldn’t be more perfect for her. It’s different than ‘Harry Potter.’ She’s showing everyone in the world that she’s got a different side of her and that she’s not just this one character. She’s kicking butt and taking names."

From justjaredjr.com (Erin Wilhelmis), "I couldn’t believe I was going to get to meet her [Emma]. She was so sweet and really helped me feel so comfortable on set. My sister literally grew up with the "Harry Potter" books. I remember my dad reading them to her before she knew how to read. She helped me to become a fan, but my sister is the ultimate fan. We both loved the character of Hermione, so it was very exciting to get to work with Emma. But Emma definitely breaks free from Hermione in this film. She is so talented and I can’t wait to watch her in many different roles to come."

From twistmagazine.com (Mae Whitman), "Emma Watson is just awesome! I mean, I’ve been a fan of hers for a long time - before Harry Potter - just her whole career seems great to me. And she’s the best kind of person to be around. Everything about her, she’s very classy and artistic and I just love her!"

Echee says: By reading all these quotes you can tell these are all set up. They are all the same. Emma is great and wonderfully talented, she played Hermione but there is so much more to her as an actress than Hermione, it was a joy to work with her and she's going to kick butt in this movie. Blah blah blah. Yadda yadda yadda. Yackity smackity. This is the Perks of being a Wallflower movie, correct? Not Harry Potter and the Revenge of the Death Eaters, right? They couldn't just let her work speak for itself without bringing up Hermione? You'd have to be just getting out of a 12 year coma not to realize this is not a Harry Potter movie. You'd have to be a complete dickwad magoo to expect Hermione to show up in Perks of being a Wallflower. Clearly this is how they are trying to attract money to the gates.

Emma Watson is such a iconic movie actress that it takes the entire cast to sell it. Did I mention I minored in sarcasm in college? The biggest bullshitter award goes to Ezra Miller. The only thing magical about Emma Watson is she's photogenic fake and flake. The dunce cap goes to Mae Whitman. You were a huge fan of hers before Harry Potter? Ok seems legit, lol. Seriously Mae, Emma had no other movies before Harry Potter. Try again. Unless you were there watching her putting on school plays in Oxford. Emma Watson is that actress who needs people to say good things about her. She does not have the talent to back it up. She needs hype, sensationalism and photography to seem better than she is. Clearly you can tell it's all about Emma Watson as Sam, not Logan Lerman as Charlie or the message this movie is trying to express. They are promoting it as Emma breaks free from Hermione.

From buzzsugar.com August 2012, "My script was covered in notes about all of these American words, American slang. I was quizzing my friends about high school and prom and everything, and then Steve was just like, "Emma, this is great and everything, but you really just need to let all of that go," because he said that he saw me as Sam, and it was kind of as simple as that. I don't know what it was that he saw in me that made him so think that it was me, but when I met with him he had a book — he made a bible of what he wanted all the visuals to look like and everything. And this was before I had even met with him, before I'd accepted, and he had photographs of me all the way through this book with ideas of Sam, [so] I knew he wasn’t bullsh*tting guess [there's] an element of paranoia for me that directors would maybe bring me on because of the huge following Harry Potter has, or for some other reason like that, so it really meant a lot for me to know that there was no one else for this role. That was really nice to know"

Funny this she said there at the end. I've said this more than a few times in various posts on Perks and Bling Ring. We've discussed that. I said this before. It's a little give and take. Emma is getting what she wants even though she said it would be stupid for her to distance herself from Hermione. You can't trust Emma's word anyway. The studious however get what they want. To make a film with limited funding but to profit off it at the box office. Of which they will do since the Harry Potter fan base is going to pay to see Emma in this movie. It's not that Emma has any real power here. The studio heads see the profit margin for this small indie film. The only reason Chbosky's says she's Sam is because Emma will make him money off a small budget. It's business and yes they are using Emma for the Harry Potter fan base but at the same time she is doing a character to help her separate herself from Hermione. Emma realizes this but she's playing an angle on it. Just like MWWM and soon to be Bling Ring, Beauty, and Noah when that comes out. They're all using her. These roles are not major complex ones. Anyone could do them.

From huffingtonpost.com Jan 2011, For a depressing book, this is pretty good news. Last June, Variety reported that 'Harry Potter' star Emma Watson had agreed to star in the big screen adaptation of the teen angst novel 'The Perks of Being a Wallflower.' The only problem was finding some funding, and a production studio. That appears to be solved. New York Magazine reports that Summit Entertainment, best known for its 'Twilight' mega-franchise, is teaming up with another teen idol to bring the film into production. They're in negotiations with the film's backers, New York reports; the book's author, Stephen Chbosky, is slated to direct the film."

From iheartwatson.net September 2012 Glamour magazine, "I also read that you met with studio executives to persuade them to fund Perks. What was that like? "No one wanted to make it at first, because it deals with difficult subject matter, so I basically went out and pitched it to studios myself. It felt very empowering to be able to get something made that I really believed in."

From mtv.com August 2012, "MTV: What were the original meetings like with the cast members? Chbosky: I met them through the audition process — Emma was an offer. I knew she was Sam. That was easy. Logan auditioned and every other person including the adults, every other person auditioned."

Basically Emma never had to audition. Emma was an offer? I am not familiar with behind the scene casting terminology but I would assume this does not mean audition. Has Emma received a role yet where it was based on her talent and not some connection to Harry Potter? I think not. Most actresses have to audition for roles but because Emma was from these Potter movies that has this huge fan base and she has this huge obsessed fans base she doesn't have to right now. She's riding on the coattails of Harry Potter. If Mae Whitman would have been cast as Sam this movie would have went straight to DVD or not even filmed. Get the girl from Harry Potter that has this ridiculous cult like draw and things will happen. Like I said above, this is business. Not about Emma having power.

From iheartwatson.net NovelNovice.com – August 17, 2012, "I really started reading scripts maybe after the fourth Harry Potter movie, around the age of 15, 16. And really didn’t read anything that I really loved instantly. And then, it was almost like, you know, not that I’d lost interest, but my agent was starting to get stressed. Pretty sure, I was kind of ‘Bleh, do I have to read it.’ And then I read The Perks of Being a Wallflower and it was so beautifully written and so funny and so incredibly moved by it, and I just instantly knew that (a) the movie had to be made and (b) that I had to play Sam. I really wanted to play Sam. I was just really drawn to her. And so, then I met with Stephen, who, when I met with Stephen, we just instantly clicked and I felt like I was meeting an old friend. And then I met Logan, and I knew he was the perfect Charlie."

Replace the words with Harry Potter and Harry it sounds like she is describing Hermione and Daniel Radcliffe. In fact she called Radcliffe the perfect Harry and said once she was waiting on a role she felt as strong as she did with Hermione. She was said to have been the perfect Hermione. Above she says Chobsky said she was Sam to him. This sounds like a Harry Potter quote from years ago. So she waited on Perks, eh? Well not really. There was another movie she was wanted to make but it never materialized. It was called Napoleon and Betsy. Here are two quotes from her on that movie.

From iheartwatson.net February 2009 "It’s a strong relationship but it’s not sexual. It’s very complex. A touching of souls. She was a very young girl and he was this older, incredible man. I read the script two years ago and just knew this was the perfect film for me." From iheartwatson.net EmmaWatson.com: 2010 "It’s a project I love and am attached to, but I don’t know if or when it will happen. I hope it does. I’m afraid that’s the nature of film making. You learn to not become too emotionally involved as scripts come and go and many of them never get off the ground."

From movienight.mtv.ca August 2012, "During Emma Watson’s tenure as the leading lady of the “Harry Potter” franchise, she rarely stepped out to work on other projects. As the series neared its end, instead of trying to prove how grown-up she was in film, she headed to Brown University and then later Oxford before settling back into life in Hollywood.“I think at first I didn’t because I was always either studying or filming, I didn’t have time to go off and do other films or other things to sort of show people that, ‘Oh, she is not just Hermione, she is an actress and she can go and do these other parts and roles.’ … I didn’t, because I was so focused on, you know, on my GCSEs and on my AS and on my A-levels and then getting in to university and then whatever, I didn’t really have time to do any of that,” she says in the new issue of T Magazine. So, as she moves farther and farther away from life as Hermione, she is inching closer and closer to films that include no magic and lots of drama. “I guess, weirdly in my head, I knew what I wanted. I didn’t know how it would or if it would ever happen,” she explained before breaking down her spate of upcoming film roles. Of the highly anticipated “Perks of Being a Wallflower,” Watson opened up to MTV News about her reasons for joining the indie film based on the book of the same name. “I feel like I’ve been waiting for ‘Perks.’ I was waiting for this story, this script, this moment,” she explained, when we visited her on set. “I was a huge ‘Harry Potter’ fan even before I did the movies, and I thought I would never find a character or material I care about so deeply and personally as I did that, and then this came along and completely swept it all.”

So what she said about her GSCE is not really true at all. Maybe she was working for them but she also was trying to get roles. She is making it sound like she was not interested and was too busy when she obviously tried. She waited for Perks? She said it would be her worst nightmare to play a rebellious teenager. Ah this is bullshit. Perks probably had the only script that put her the farthest away from Hermione so she took it. Another thing she said she would never do. She said she would not be so tactful and it would be stupid. Yet her eshe is doing all these things. Also what she said about starting to read scripts at 16 or 17 with never reading anything she loved instantly is not true. She loved Napoleon and Betsy and let's not forget Ballet Shoes

From glamourvanity.com 2007, “I was all set to go back to school after finishing Harry Potter [and the Order of the Phoenix] but couldn’t resist Ballet Shoes. I really loved it.” “I always had concerns that I was Hermione because I looked like a Hermione – but what else did I bring? So this was the test. And it worked. Ballet Shoes was a small production, but it gave me the confidence to think I could actually have a career as an actress after the Harry Potter films. That I wouldn’t just always be Hermione.”

About these scripts she speaks of. The one similarity is she was begged to do movies. I always felt this was strange. If she was a sought after in demand actress as her fans love to say then why was she getting bad scripts and why would anyone have to beg her to do roles? In Ballet Shoes, MWWM and Perks (click this link regarding no more teen roles) she was begged to do those roles. Although for Bling Ring she said she met Sophie Coppala before she knew of Bling Ring. I really get a sense she was typecast hard and this too was another angle to make it look like she wasn't. I think she had to sell out and now sells sex to even have a career in the first place. I said almost a year ago that's what she'll have to do. Emma is a proclaimed perfectionist, quite high up on herself and has this ability to play things down when she is really hyping them up. So it's pretty plausible to me this might be the case. She's all about image anyway.

From emma-watson.net, June 2011, "Although Ms. Watson, now 21, was dead set against more high school roles, her agent pressed the script on her, and the actress fell in love with it. "Once she and I met, we both knew in each other we had a kindred spirit," Mr. Chbosky (author of book and director of movie) says. In January, she made the rounds at studios to plead the case for "Perks." Summit Entertainment, the studio behind Twilight

From collider.com Nov 2010, "Was it hard to say yes to the role or was it so easy? "I was coming back on the train from Paris having just done a photo shoot and I was exhausted and the last thing I wanted to do was read a script. And my agent called me up and was like "please just read the script, you won’t regret it, please just read it." I so didn’t want to, and the minute I opened it up I couldn’t put it down. And the part was small but really interesting and had like a really good character arc and was really well formed even though it had a few scenes. And I called her straight back and was like "yes alright you were right. I’m in I’m in I’m in." So it was nice. Yeah I was offered the part so that was amazing."

From telegraph.co.uk Dec 2007, "Emma Watson famous as Hermione Granger in the films is to star in BBC1 new adaptation as Pauline, the eldest Fossil. She says she only took the role because is also a favourite of JK Rowling. "Jo said, You have to take the part, just for my sake", says Watson."