Emma's quotes to remember

DISCLAIMER: This blog is my opinion. I'm not saying everything I say is true but I'm not making anything up. I pride myself on using facts, evidence, sources, and deductive reasoning. I'm not an inside source but I was not born yesterday. I use Emma's words showing her inconsistencies with what she says versus what she does. Everything she says is actually the opposite of who she is when you pay attention to what she actually does. She preaches about being honest and true to yourself when she isn't. She claims virtues and convictions she doesn't adhere to. She constantly portrays a false sense of modesty, morality and ethics that she never follows. It's not her actions that bother me. She can smoke crack for all I care. It's all her deceptions that built up her fake persona she gets lauded for. She is more of a brand than being the genuine article. Emma is a prettily weaved illusion designed to trick you. She is a celebrity (they get so much attention in society) and she is pretty (beauty culture obsession), and these days that’s as good as being a god (celebrity worship syndrome). This blog was not created to point out what an awful human being she is. I don't believe she's a horrible person but when it comes to a stereotyped fake celebrity she fits the mold perfectly. This blog was created as a push back to the mindless adoration and to point out what others refuse or fail to do. I don’t know Emma the private person but what I do know is Emma the public person (celebrity) is full of contradiction, hypocrisy and deceptions. Her entire public persona is built on being the anti-celebrity but in reality she's ever bit of the fame hungry attention seeker she claims not to be. Celebrities should be looked at as products. They're trying to sell us (the consumers) something by using the same marketing ploys we see in ads every day. They make millions doing this. We have every right as consumers to call bullshit when the product does not work as advertised. Celebrities made a choice to be public figures and can walk away anytime they wish so anything they put out there is up for debate.

QUOTES OF EMMA'S TO REMEMBER: "There seems to be this feeling that all of us were bursting to break out of these images we had created but that’s never been the case (2009)." and "I do not think I "ought" to be a model of reference for my fame. But I want to do something good by using my public image and reputation (2009)." and "Actually, I'm quite shy, I've never liked attention and money. I feel myself a little bit like Finding Nemo's Dory. I just keep swimming and don't turn around to watch the mess (2010)." and "I think you should be yourself because otherwise, you'll be on the wrong path and the results are not gonna be pretty (2010)." and " It's very weird. I have to kind of like switch heads. Sometimes I manage it seamlessly, and other times I feel rather all over the place. I explained to a friend that sometimes I feel a bit schizophrenic, like I have a split personality (2010)." and "In terms of a role model the cleanest way to live as a human and artist to be true to yourself (2011)." and "Never have something to hide or lose (2011)." and "Fame was never something I ever aspired to and it's not something I aspire to now really (2011)." NEW ONES (I find these new ones peculiar because I've said she's fake and a brand repeatedly since February 2011: Is she trying to come clean?): "Let’s say there’s a side of me, the one represented in the media, that does not match who I really am in private life. (2012)." and "It kind of does feel that way [like I am a brand]. That’s just something I’ve come to realize, that there’s a public persona (2013)." and "When you’re playing someone else and you’re playing a public persona for the media, you almost lose your own identity and who you are." and "I try my best to be as authentic as I can. I try to be real, but I also understand there’s a distinction between the me that walks red carpets, and the me that is just myself, at home (2013)." and "Similar to you, I used to try to hide what I was doing, and I would end up in these awkward positions where I would have to go and do something [for work] but I would say I was doing something else. I would try to hide that I had a car picking me up—I would hide the car around the corner so that people would think I was walking. All of these elaborate kinds of schemes to pretend I was like everyone else (2013).”

ONE MORE EMMA QUOTE TO CONSIDER from an interview in 2009, "Did you ever steal any of the props? “Yes, I did. We were doing a scene in Gringotts and there was all of this plastic gold that’s in there, but Dan, Rupert and I spent like the whole week smuggling it out for crew members who wanted souvenirs. They weren’t giving any of it away, so we nicked it. We were actually competing in the end and I got really good at it. I looked like the innocent one, so they nobody really noticed me, but they checked the boys. So I think I got about four or five pieces out. That was funny.” And that's the just of it. Emma looks to innocent to be anything other than what she makes herself up to be. It makes doing this blog rather difficult at times because people do not want to believe Emma is anything but honest. There is also the issue of Emma stating for years she is just like the fictional character Hermione. People get confused between Emma the actress and Hermione the make believe character she was portraying. They are nothing alike.

OTHER QUOTES: "The great thing about Emma is that she's a chameleon that can communicate anything you ask." - Mario Testino. "Any actor who tells you that they have become the people they play, unless they’re clearly diagnosed as a schizophrenic, is bullshitting you.” - Gary Oldman. "The image is one thing and the human being is another...It's very hard to live up to an image, put it that way." - Elvis Presley. "It is much easier to be honest than to be caught up in a bunch of lies. At least this way, you know who you are." - Mila Kunis

WELCOME: This is a place where you can freely speak your mind far from the fan girls, fan boys, stans, and Potterheads. As long as I am motivated to do this blog I will continue to post when I feel like it or can. I consider this a hobby, and like so many hobbies you can get bored with them. It's not a normal hobby (lol) but it's always been fun pointing out all her deceptions, contradictions and hypocrisy. I quit this blog twice. The longest was for ten months. It killed this blog because everyone that commented is gone. It is what it is.

Two pages to check out and one forum:
1.) meettherealemmawatson.tumblr.com
2.) emma-what-son.tumblr.tumblr.com (no affiliation)
3.) emma-what-son.forumcommunity.net (no affiliation)

March 11, 2011

Is Emma Watson's nude fake really a fake?

FOR THE RECORD THIS PHOTO HAS BEEN DEEMED PHOTO SHOP

The photo of Emma in a bathroom with a towel around her waist has been labeled a fake. It was photo shopped. The thing about this particular photo is that it was on the net way before it was an issue at Brown. Why make a fuss over one photo when there are loads out there? I am sure this is not the only nude fake of Emma that went all over Brown. Most likely a majority of Brown students, be it guys, already saw this photo. They're all over the Internet. However, I know nothing about photo shop but the breasts in this photo when it comes to size and nipples look oddly familiar.

Let's play devils advocate. You can make a photo look photo shopped.

From popeater.com November 9th 2010

"Emma Watson is said to be shocked that an apparently fake image of her with just a towel around her waist is being e-mailed among her classmates at Brown University." According to the Daily Mail, Emma is trying to seek out the source of the image so she can put a stop to it. She says the picture is a fake. Emma's spokesman said: "There have been a number of nude fakes over the past two months. Emma has seen them and finds them tiresome. People should know better." This comes days after Emma gave a candid interview to Marie Claire, during which she called her friends at Brown "protective." "I found a great group of girlfriends," she told the mag. "Brown has a real sense of community, and people are very protective of me. They really look out for me; they want me to feel like I'm part of it." Watson, in an interview with The Sun, said, "I wished I'd done more naughty things."























What are the chances of a this deemed nude fake of Emma having what looks like identical breasts with the girl someone was said to have photo shopped Emma's head on? They point to the necklace to show proof to covering up photo shop evidence. I've seen the other photo with what it said to be the real girl. I'm not making any claims because I'm not schooled with photo shopping. I don't know but you look and compare. If photo shop is correct they were dead on with the breasts. Who knows but the record states it's a fake.

SIDE BY SIDE




From popsugar.co.uk Feb 2011, "On her Harry Potter costars: "Daniel (Radcliffe), Rupert (Grint) and me have been incredibly protected doing the Harry Potter movies. There seems to be this feeling that all of us were bursting to break out of these images we had created."

Do you think possibly they protected her image with these?

Other than the breasts looking the same we have the knuckles and hands. I know this sounds weird. I'm pointing out knuckles and hands but they also look the same. I don't know. What do you think?

As per: nudography.com (I got this link off a peachyforum.com) Quote below also shown at beautyden.com and at teencelebrity.net. "Harry Potter' film actress Emma Watson has said she would do a nude scene in a future film or stage role if the script called for it. Watson got on the topic of getting naked on BBC's Live Five radio programme when asked what she thinks about fellow 'Potter' star Daniel Radcliffe going full frontal in next year's stage production of Peter Shaffer's 'Equus'. She told interviewer Simon Mayo the following: "I think it's wonderful that Daniel is willing to be so brave for his craft. It's a big risk doing something like this while being so internationally known, but he's a true professional". When asked if she would ever bare all for her art, Watson replied, "Yes, absolutely. I would do it if the script called for it. I guess I would be a little nervous, but I've been told I look good naked, so I guess I've got little to worry about". When Shaffer asked Watson who thinks she looks good naked, she playfully said, "Now, now! I won't say. But I trust his expert opinion".

FYI this photo linked was reported to be from an EX-BOYFRIEND

Check THIS post I did on her nose.


UPDATE: It's January 7th, 2014 and I posted this on March 11th 2011, and I have to say seeing her breast exposures sine then I think this was photo shopped. Despite the similarities and whatnot, of which I was 50/50 on, I don't think it's her. Despite that I am keeping this post up since it brings a lot of traffic to my site.  

Other posts

Emma Watson is a rubbish girlfriend?
Emma can't have a love story
Emma Watson intimidates guy
Emma Watson's dating fame wall
Emma's been whining she can't get a man for years
Emma Watson kissing George Craig
Emma Watson-Johnny Simmons

109 comments:

Anonymous said...

You say you're not making any claims, but you're certainly implying that it's not fake.

Maybe post this supposed original picture as an added comparison?

Who knows? Maybe the "original" is the photoshopped one. Worth looking into.

It is odd that this one would get so much attention long after it was seen first, as though she'd only just seen it last year. Breast size fluctuates with age, weight, body mass ratio, etc, but breast and nipple shape generally does not change, and certainly the shape is identical in both pictures.

Food for thought.

cripps said...

Well, this is pretty interesting, I dismissed this one years back, but considering know one had seen what her breasts looked like when this was made, they certainly got it surprisingly accurate. Like, spot on. That would be some improbable luck if it is fake.

No way to know for sure, though. Right now that is.

I think it can be settled if this is fake when she does a nude scene for a film and a complete comparison can be done. That's right, when, not if. I think with the way she is in her personal life, things she has said in interviews, and of course how she has and is conducting her film career, I think it's an inevitability, not a possibility, that she'll go nude in films, don't you think?

sKull said...

hahahaha, busted!

if you want people to keep thinking of it as a fake, don't make a massive deal about getting rid of it! certainly don't get news articles about it, ha. especially when she's no stranger to showing lots of skin, and the picture isn't exactly obvious (its not like porn or something usual for fake pics, just a candid photo)

nice find here

Anonymous said...

the real girl: http://www.totallyupyours.com/4a637c7e3a10e-emma_watson_topless_picture_is_fake.html

Rensi said...

This will probably end up somewhat long winded, but I thought this was worthy of an analysis:

Now someone posted that other picture that has been labelled the real picture. The obvious thing is to assume that it is, and that the Emma picture is fake (as is normal with any nude celebrity picture that has an original posted).

However, I'd like to examine it regardless. Now the blogger noted he isn't an expert, and I woouldn't say I'm an expert, but I do have a good deal of experience in photoshop.

If Emma's picture is a fake, then it's easily the best fake I've ever seen. I can detect none of the usual signs of photoshop.
- The skintone of her face matches the body's exactly
- There is no "join" visible anywhere near the head
- The head is in perfect proportion with the body (and also matches Emma's real life proportions)
- Her expression matches her actions
- The hair matches Emma's real wavy light brown hair of several years ago (kept brown for her Harry Potter role, she is more blonde naturally)
- As noted by the blogger and other commenters, the breasts in the photo match Emma's in the more recent photos, with the same shape, tone, areola size and nipple size, with a very similar overall size. It's rather uncanny
- Finally the picture in itself is not improbable, it isn't obscene or unlikely, it is a girl with a towel in a bathroom.

The only thing that threw me was the necklace,; however, it is present in both pictures so it is part of the original either way.

All of the above would likely be thrown out because of there being an "original". It seems likely and I'd have assumed it too, had it not been for the vehement response to the fake from Emma late last year (several years after I first saw the photo).


The character limit will be hit soon, so this message will have to be two part, continued below.

Rensi said...

The second photo also has no major signs of photoshop, however, I do note some curiosity's
- The quality of the overall photo isn't high, it's low resolution and does not capture lots of detail. The face in the second photo however, and the neck, feature more detail than the rest of the photo, both on the body and the background.
- The necklace sits strangely, not following the contours of the neck. This could be a result of the neck turning, but it isn't the same necklace found in the first picture (which sits exactly), it is either the original, or it's been moved in from another source
- The hair has changed from the first photo, it is less full and oddly "blurred", with what is almost aliasing (not found anywhere else in the photo). This would indicate it was reduced.
- The use of a face turned towards the camera has the advange of appearing larger head on. The neck likewise widens as it is turned. This is used in many fakes and has the advantage of easily covering anything it is placed over, making the seams harder to see. In the first photo, Emma's face and neck take up less room, but there is no detail of the background lost (this detail would not be present if the original took up more space, and would haveto be created). There isn't any signs of smearing or copying on the background around the head/neck in the first picture.

The things the second has going for it are the obvious fact that it features more of the room. This means it was either the original, or it is made directly from a larger original (and the first photo is cropped from said picture). The other is the standard "assume the celebrity nude is fake" mantra.

So do I have a conclusion? Not really, I feel it is not cut and dry enough to have a conclusion. For the first time ever, I am not ruling out that the labelled fake is not automatically fake when faced with a labelled original. There is enough to make either the original or the photoshopped.

I leave it up to others to decide. I expect any Emma fan will dismiss this, but the examination of both pictures, coupled with the odd reaction Emma had to THIS photo being circulated and not the hundreds of other fakes no doubt found at Brown (since this fake was "settled" with the timely appearance of the supposed original a few years ago), to me, means there is plenty to think about here. I found her comment about being determined to "find the source" very intriguing. Whether she meant the original of the "fake" or whoever put the photo on the internet was unclear.

This is probably long enough by now to be a blog post in itself, so I'd better finish up. To me, either side is believable and plausible, it's up to you to decide for yourselves.

E-Chee Wah-Wah said...

No problem. I like the theories.

Thanks =)

Anonymous said...

After reading the entry and that long post by rensi, I'm actually kinda convinced it's real.

I wouldn't have thought it before, but after that evidence I can imagine a situation where that picture is just a candid, private photo of Emma, then it leaks a few years ago, and a replacement is cooked up to "debunk" it. Picture gets forgotten quickly as another fake. Then last winter it shows up again at Brown, and suddenly Emma is furious at it, demanding to know the "source", i.e. who spread it. Why else make a big deal over this fake and no other?

It's hypothetical and speculation on my part, I know, and i'm not a photoshop expert, but from the evidence presented here, I think it's very plausible the "fake" isn't at all fake, and Emma's trying to cover up quickly.

Just an opinion, but I'm being objective and looking at the evidence presented to decide. I think it might be real.

Anonymous said...

I think the pic of the so called "real girl" looks more photoshopped than the pic of Emma. I'd like to add to Rensi's post there that the lighting also matches perfectly in Emma's picture (coming from her left, lighting up only one side of her in equal measure), yet in the second picture the lighting is much whiter on the girl's face than anywhere else. It looks to me like it was brightened in photoshop to try and match the rest of the photo, and they went too far.

Also, I note that the upper chest, not the breasts but the area between the neck and breasts, is a perfect match to Emma's. This is seen the side by side comparison. There is always a "dip" in the centre, it's part of the ribcage, but it does look different on different people, yet this one looks exactly the same in both pictures, and the breasts even start in the same place.

Like others said, it's not certain, it's up to the individual to decide. There's enough evidence either way.

Personally, I now think it's really Emma in that pic.

hunny said...

oh wow, i think you might be right! there's just too much coincidence going on here, and she's all up in arms over the suspiciously good fake? i'm convinced its not a fake at all now.

hunny said...

oh yeah something i think is worth mentioning. on the news right now theres a story about at least 50 celebirty women who had nude photos stolen and are ready to be leaked by a hacker who the fbi are going after now. that goes to show that theres a lot of celebrities with pics like this one, even if its jst the 1 or 2. its not just the obviously slutty ones with nude pics, theres a lot more. with all this, i think its obvious emma had a photo leaked a few years back imo

Rensi said...

I didn't notice that when I was looking yesterday, but you point out now about the knuckles. It does sound strange, but hands are one of the most distinctive parts of a person. You mightn't think so but they are very much unique to the person.

They are certainly extremely similar, if not identical hands in the two compared pictures.

Quite interesting, indeed.

E-Chee Wah-Wah said...

Yea rensi I noticed that today. I bet they'll say her hands are photo shopped in. I dont know but it does make you think doesnt it?

Rensi said...

Well, if they did say that, that'd open another can of worms, since the picture put forward as the "real one" has the same hands.

I doubt they'd claim they're both photoshopped, so either the hands belong to Emma or a model used for a fake.

Heh, by now if it is a fake, they apparently used a model who is identical to Emma in nearly every way apart from her face.

We'll never know for sure, of course, but I'd love to see someone explain the borderline impossible luck someone making a fake would have to have had.

Anonymous said...

I'm not convinced. There's some similarities, ok, but I simply don't see her having this kind of photo taken or leaked. Where would it have come from, like? It doesn't seem possible to me.

Plus there would have been way more controversy over it if it was real.

Anonymous said...

Huh, well, this is interesting. There's no denying the comparison has a ton of similarities. Could this be one of the first occasions ever where a labelled fake was spoken for too soon?

E-Chee Wah-Wah said...

I don't know. Could it because this may have been taken while she was not 18 yet? That and the press just adores her for teh most part. its the gossip websites and papparazzi that see her when the television and movie cameras are not present.

They point out the necklace as to why its a fake.

who knows?

thanks for the feed back.

Anonymous said...

Well that necklace line is nonsense, since it's present in the supposed "original", and is similar to what Emma wears for jewelery anyway.

I haven't heard too many arguments from the people in the "it's fake" camp, which I think is strange. Do they not feel like defending or do they not have much to defend with?

Anonymous said...

no doubt emma fans will just say "fake" and dismiss it, but there are clearly far too many coincidences for this to be dismissed easily. there's definitely something here.

Anonymous said...

Guess we know who thought she looked good naked then, whoever took this picture.

By the way where was it reported this was from an ex-boyfriend? That'd cement it, for me, it's more than believable.

E-Chee Wah-Wah said...

anon above..

here is one link talking about teh ex boyfriend. this is one i chose... the date is july 2009. the nude pic scandal was fall 2010

http://thedirty.com/2009/07/harry-potters-emma-watson-real-nude/

Im going to make thisa link in the post.

Interesting isn't it?

Anonymous said...

Well it's not like she hasn't left behind a few disgruntled boyfriends, I don't think it's unbelievable that one would leak a picture.

matilda said...

Ok I've some experience in photoshop, and frankly, I quite firmly believe the "real" picture posted in a link above is a photoshopped picture. The head is both out of proportion with the body and simply awkwardly sat, it looks distinctly too big in order to cover up the previous image with less work (common in lazier or less skilled photoshop users)

Now I'm not saying anything about the Emma picture, just that I believe the photo put forward as the real one is heavily edited.

rex said...

It's her, I think. Few too many coincidences, similarities and suspicious behaviors. Going down as real and leaked in my book.

E-Chee Wah-Wah said...

I'm begining to think that too rex. I was skeptical. when you look at the "real" girl it looks more photoshopped than this "fake" emma one.

Anonymous said...

wow thats amazing, i never realized this stuff fit together so well before. nice detective work

Viridian said...

I always thought this particular "fake" looked a little TOO good to be easily dismissed.

The evidence put forward here only reinforces that belief (possibly even confirms it as not fake after all), for me. Nice to see other people taking a look at all angles, regardless of how the conclusion will make the celebrity look.

Anonymous said...

I distinctly remember seeing this picture posted a few years back. I'm afraid I don't have the link to the place I first saw it, but I remember it causing a little bit of a stir, simply because all the photoshop experts in that posting couldn't find any signs of a photoshop, that coupled with the candid nature of the picture and the fact that it was reported to be from an ex-boyfriend, gave it a little bit of profile.

Obviously, that ended after a while when someone anonymous suddenly showed up with the "real" picture. It got forgotten after that, since people assumed if there was a picture put forward as the real one, the celebrity picture must be fake. I didn't put much thought to it myself, though I didn't forget that the "fake" was seen to be devoid of signs of tampering by experts.

Now we have this comparison bringing it back up, and of course the big stir Emma raised about this particular picture. Quite a few things fit together here. Interesting developments for sure.

What do you think Echee? I know you've said in the post you're not claiming anything, but after the other comments examining evidence and possibilities, what do you reckon about this picture?

E-Chee Wah-Wah said...

anon click BOYFRIEND above that is in blue. It's a link. you may have seen it there.

The record states it is a fake. Since I am no expert I can't say it's real. However, like I said in my post the breasts and hands look the same. One person above in the comments pointed out her chest above her breats with that line going down the middle.

Those who commented seems to know their stuff with photoshop but I do not know who they are. I respect what they have to say. I have no reason not to believe them. I'm just swating on the side of caution because some of that could ahve been copied and pasted.

I wrote this blog up as more of a "questions" to those who read it. I pointed out the simularities I see and put out a hypothetic scenerio. Anything is possible. I don't think emma is a saint that's for sure. I woud love for a real photoshop expert to debunk if it;s real or fake

Anonymous said...

That's good of you to remain neutral and not jump to the worst conclusion about her at the first sign of evidence. Makes this blog refreshingly objective. You're not looking for the negative stuff about Emma, it's there in evidence and you're reporting it. Same with this picture.

There is evidence either way, and you're simply not ruling out either possibility instead of jumping to a conclusion. The fans did jump to a conclusion by assuming it's fake and not questioning a thing, so well done on that.

Anonymous said...

Not to sound "pervy", but in the interests of analysis, it's worth pointing out that when you say the breasts look identical, they're identical.

From looking at both comparisons, you can see no differences overall. They're the exact same size (as can be seen more clearly in the second comparison). They have the same shape, even with the same curve at the bottom (again see the second comparison). The nipples are identical in size, colour and position, and the areola (size and colour) is also a perfect match (the only difference being that in the "fake" the nipples are hard; they are still identical). The breasts are even positioned in the same place on both overall chests.

Bearing in mind the "fake" was out several years before the pictures of Emma in the blue dress, what are the chances of the breasts being so perfectly identical? Ten thousand to one?

Anonymous said...

That is a very VERY good photoshop if it is. Hard to tell, I think it might be a fake but at the same time I also have the feeling that it is legitimate..

kiki said...

Agreed with newest anon, it's a sublime photoshop if it is a photoshop, to the point that I'm leaning halfway towards thinking it's not a photoshop at all.

Anonymous said...

well it looks pretty damn real to me, and i'm quite familiar with photoshop.

E-Chee Wah-Wah said...

That makes one of us. I simply point out the breasts and hands along with the knuckles. Im not expert. I just thought when i compared them it look the same. I really wish a real photo shop expert would debunk this.

Anonymous said...

haha, I find it funny how much you hate this girl, do you want to sleep with her or something?

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_cdssQZkeskc/S2jFvs4sSVI/AAAAAAAAAvc/_auVU_wbBao/s1600-h/Fake-Emma.jpg
In this link you can see where the real emma watson face comes from.

IMO; you are off on many things on your blog, your hasty drawing conclusions in some of your posts.
It is not ulikely that she has just been insecure and at the same time wants to be famous and have a big movie career, this seems more likely to me than that she is lying all the time. Consider the culture she grew up in.
One thing I agree on is she seems alittle bit slutty etc. And maybe stupider than let on, but come on.

And also dating boy band members and stuff, you would think she had more brains than only dating model type rockstar posers with no talent.

E-Chee Wah-Wah said...

You know whats funny about that? The girl; makes a lot of the same facial expressions in a lot of photos. I can show you ide by side comparrisons of her smiles, smirks and other expressions and it's a mirror. The one thing I do buy from one of teh comments above is the "real" girls face is off color compared to teh rest of her body while the "fake" of emma's face is match on with the rest of teh body. The other thing is why make a big deal over one photo of hundred or possibly thousands out there that look as "real" as this one is deemed "fake"?

Anonymous said...

Look at the hair, it matches completly , round the ear, the folds, notice how the bottom lip matches COMPLETLY.

I don`t think she made such a big deal about it, she took care of it herself and not the police.

Thats where the face was taken from.

It is a fake.
scuse my engrish

Jules said...

How do you explain the breasts and hands that match? What are the odds like the blogger said? This photo was not even challenged once her people said it's fake. Everyone just gave up because emma would not do this. Then for her to get her lawyers involved is another sign. Her hair and lips match up on other photos.

E-Chee Wah-Wah said...

To the anon that says I am off I find it funny when people say that to me and then find somewhere to agree with me. You think maybe you're in denial? Just wondering. I get that alot. That im unhinged or something but they follow up with some sort of agreement with me.

Anonymous said...

Those photos aren't actually exact anon up there, for starters they're at slightly different angles, not something that can be altered with photoshop without leaving huge signs of it.

Echee is right in saying it's a standard facial expression for her in any case. The half-smirk in particular is found on countless photos.

Once again, when the "fake" looks less photoshopped than the "real", you need to wonder things. This is what the blog is about, not taking everything at face value and questioning the information fed to us by her and her PR.

Anonymous said...

Could be real, alright. Can't be certain, but there's enough evidence for it to be believably real, just not conclusive proof.

Good work pointing out the evidence though.

Anonymous said...

doesn't look at all fake to me, looks very real in fact. I'm hardly an expert but it looks real to me.

Anonymous said...

i'm gonna stay in the non-believing camp.

i admit there's a lot of similarities and coincidences, and the behavior towards the photo was weird, but i can't really see emma letting this sort of photo being taken.

sig11 said...

don't you think that's letting your perception of emma cloud your view of the situation? you admit there's evidence but dismiss it just based on what you think emma is like. you should go by the evidence and not by the preconceived notions you have of her.

Anonymous said...

Looks pretty damn real to me. The boobs are an exact match with her exposed ones, not to mention the rest of the body. The sheer unlikelihood of that gives it a huge amount of credibility.

Nice find, blogger.

Anonymous said...

agreed with other posters here, it looks real and a perfect match, too perfect for a fake

Anonymous said...

woah woah woah, so these old photo might actually be REAL? that is crazy, I had dismissed it years back but now I'm looking at it in a new light. it sure is uncannily similar to her in those comparisons...might you have uncovered a secret of miss watson's?

Anonymous said...

I definitely agree with the other posters, this is way too similar to be a coincidence. I think perhaps Emma had a candid picture taken of her by one of her (many) boyfriends, who leaked it after the relationship ended, accidentally or intentionally, and it was dismissed as fake and of course Emma's PR people encouraged it. Then it got passed around at Brown last year and she flipped out, since she thought it was dead and buried. Fits with everything we know about the picture and her reactions to it, I think.

Steve said...

It's absolutely fake.
Here's the original & the fake side-by-side:
http://egotastic.com/2009/07/this-is-not-emm/emma-watson-nude-picture-fake-3/

I would love if it was real, but alas not. Try to do a bit of research next time eh?

Anonymous said...

Read the other comments, there was research done, including on the photo put forward as the original.

It remains unclear and inconclusive, as that picture put forward is also dodgy.

Anonymous said...

Ugh! she has a birthmark above her belly button on the left side. Damn it for that towel!! Thats how we could tell if it is real.

E-Chee Wah-Wah said...

I have no clue if it real or fake. I'm just pointing out the simularities. It's said to be a fake. So until that changes we have to go with that.

But I can agree with a few of you that it would be really easy to cover this up with making the real photo the fake and photo shopping what is deemed the real naked girl. I don't think that's a crazy theory.

I don't think we'll ever know.

Anonymous said...

Right on, Echee. There's equal evidence for it being real or fake, it could easily be one or the other. There's never going to be a way to know for absolute certain, but the similarities are there for all to see. Whether or not it's real, the real lesson is to not simply dismiss it just because Emma and her PR people tell you it's fake, but instead to examine the evidence yourself.

Crag said...

Huh, I saw this a long time ago and assumed it was fake. It does look pretty real, and the resemblance body wise is pretty uncanny. Can't be sure of course but it's definitely a possibility that it's really Emma.

I wonder how it might have happened.

Anonymous said...

I agree with the notion that there's evidence for both sides, but having looked at everything, I think there's more evidence pointing towards it being real. That's what I've concluded anyway, it just seems to fit.

birch said...

quite eye opening, after seeing this I think i'll not dismiss this sort of picture outright without looking at the evidence myself, and certainly not take the celebrity's word for it.
for the record i think it wasn't really a fake at all and she just tried to have it covered up

Anonymous said...

exactly birch, her behaviour towards it gave it away and confirmed it for me

Anonymous said...

if it's real, and it seem very possible, i must say, she has a nice pair of tits.

Anonymous said...

I'm a photoshop expert,and I can claim it's FAKE!

1-Beginning with the fact that we already have the original
"emma's head" where it was taken from.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_cdssQZkeskc/S2jFvs4sSVI/AAAAAAAAAvc/_auVU_wbBao/s1600-h/Fake-Emma.jpg


2-You can see in the original one, (the girl who's looking at the camera) that in the background, there's a brick's white line over her shoulder, that can barely being seen through her hair, that in the fake one is lacking.

3-Anybody who knows how to use photoshop can't claim that it must be real cos "the proportions are exactly" or "the color skin totally match" I mean, with Photoshop you can make it happen!

4-The Focusing level in o the original is more obvious, you can see in the fake one the details are blurred, including her hair!

5-The necklace has more details in the original than in the FAKE one.

6-Finally, and more important, in the link I put, (and someone alredy had put it ) There's the original Emma's picture where it was taken from, to do the editing.
Furthermore there's not only her face in the edited one, also her hair is completely the same!
It would be too much coincidence, that Emma, besides doing the "same facial expresions", would always have the fibers of her hair in the same exactly position!

Anonymous said...

read the other comments. that link to the supposive "real' girl has been debunked as well. We will never know.

Anonymous said...

Check this video out. The date is off but you can change that on a video. What do you think? It looks like her.

http://xhamster.com/movies/180362/emma_watson_masturbate.html

Anonymous said...

ABOUT THE VIDEO.

1-The date...Emma was 9 years old.
2-Why if is Emma, someone "put" that date on this video, just for "save her"?
3-the song... is from that time.

The girl, looks like her but
SHE'S DEFINITELY NOT!

Anonymous said...

you can change the date the camera and they play old music on teh radio all the time.

Anonymous said...

AGAIN:
Why would the person who filmed the video change the date?
just for save her? that's ridiculous!

In fact, if the person who filmed the video, knew she was Emma, Would just have put the camera on her face while she was masturbating, and put "the real date" on the video.
just to show the world how
"dirty Emma can be"
than again, if you wanna believe is Emma, it's ok! is your fantasy!! :)

Anonymous said...

I mean who cares she is extremely hot and sexy

asd said...

Well if it was photo shopped it was clearly photo shopped by a girl or a fag because who wouldn't want a image of her lower half??? >,<

Anonymous said...

Those postings do seem to gel with what we know of Emma at Brown, and more importantly lend some more credibility to this photo or that other one we heard of more recently being the real deal.

It explains why she was so vehement about getting it thrown under the rug when it was passed around at Brown, anyway.

Anonymous said...

This is Indeed a FAKE of Emma Watson! I have seen the original Fake of this, full size, with the fakir's name at the bottom right corner of the fake. Fakir's name is Tatoo Hearts. The original full size fake can be seen at, onlythebestfakes.com. Tatoo Hearts has a site located at http://tatoohearts.blogfree.net

Anonymous said...

Looks real to me. I agree with the others that said the suspected fake with emma look like the real one and the real one looks more fake. The skin tone is both the faces. Emma's photo matches with her body. The other one is all distorted.

Her people could have easily set it up to make it look like it was fake. Why would she get bent out of shape for one of many like this all over the web? There is something more to this.

Anonymous said...

you can tell that it is fake look at the weird shadow behind the hair.

Anonymous said...

Bottom photo:

Emma hair shadow looks like it fits with the shape of her hair and head position. If anythng the emma nude is the real one. Look at the one of the left. It does not match up.

Lily said...

I think it's funny that you completely changed what Emma said in the BBC interview. She never said someone told her she looked good naked and that she trusted their expert opinion! She said that she would love to have the opportunity to play a role so huge and have that much of a part in something.

Echee said...

so I have acess to that website and somehow changed that quote from their website.... ummmm ok?

Anonymous said...

there's some fairly damning evidence on here, and I'm not just talking about the photo itself

her reaction is a lot like scarlet johannsson's reaction to her recent cellphone pics being released, which inadvertently proved they were real. scarlett went to the fbi to ask for help in tracking down who leaked the photos, which she wouldn't have done if they were fakes.

emma goes on this little crusade to get rid of this one photo, but it's supposed to be a fake?

I'm not buying it, and other people on here and poked various holes in the supposed "real" photo and how it's no more believable then the one showing emma.

you are definitely on to something here, it's very possible that this was a real photo that was leaked, and she tried to cover up

Anonymous said...

have to agree with others here who notice that the photo that's supposed to be the "real" one looks more fake than the photo of emma. seems to me that the whole thing was a quickly thrown together cover-up of a real leaked picture of emma. it's what everything points to, in any case

Anonymous said...

lol

maybe you should switch around the "real" and "fake" labels on the last picture there, so the emma one reads "real" instead

seems more likely

Anonymous said...

looks real to me

emma tried a coverup i think

Anonymous said...

If you take both photo's and line them up in layers , you will find the bottom of Emma's hair just above her left shoulder is inside a photo shop brush orb,on the implied real photo.When you fluctuate the opacity you will see Emma's picture is the real photo.Someone transposed another girls face on her photo then tried to claim it is real.Sorry Emma but we can see the truth and you look great.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for pointing that out, anon.

It seems the supposed "real" one is indeed a photoshop. Nice try, Emma.

Anonymous said...

ok, after these months of comments and analysises and evidence, that last comment about the photoshop opacity has pushed it over the edge for me.

for me, it's confirmed, the picture of Emma is real (the picture of the random girl is just a fake slapped together by her PR to cover it up).

can't hide the truth, Emma

salla said...

simply have to agree with others here, after all this i definitely believe it's a real pic of emma. well done blogger

Anonymous said...

i think its really emma

Anonymous said...

really well spotted, blogger, and elaborated on.
looks like you're spot on and this was a real pic of Emma after all

Echee said...

Glad you approve. =) You'll probably disaprove with the rest of my blog even though I don;t get too much hate here. Every once ina while. I'm no photoshop expert. It just something I noticed. I could be right but then again it has been deemed a fake. Those who commented above you make some pretty convincing arguements for it. I thought it made no sense for emma to sick her lawyers on this when there are loads more out there that are fakes but look so real. I'm sure you came across them.

Anonymous said...

I must say that this photo threw me off too. And after reading the evidence that's been written here, I started believing that it may be a real photo of her.
However, I MUST point out that the more I studied this particular image that Anonymous posted, the more I believe it is a fake after all.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_cdssQZkeskc/S2jFvs4sSVI/AAAAAAAAAvc/_auVU_wbBao/s1600-h/Fake-Emma.jpg

Being an art student, I take a lot of anatomy classes and have drawn the figure a lot; and I regret to say that while the lighting, body parts, hands, etc. in the photo all bear an uncanny resemblance to Emma's, the way her neck is joined/shaped is anatomically impossible. In the real photo where she is looking down, you see that the neck is soft, as it should be, because the sternocleidomastoid muscle is not being pulled. (You may google that if it is unfamiliar, lol). They are the two muscles on either side of the neck that attach between the clavicle bones. You can feel it stretch when you turn your head to the side as far as you can turn it. And only when you are turning your head, as the "original photo" girl is doing, will the muscle be taut and straight like that. Emma, however, is looking down; even though the angle of the photo is tilted to make it appear less obvious.

Anatomy aside, you can see that the photo of her head really was taken from the one of her in the black dress. The lighting, positioning, even that little curl of hair on the side of her face is identical. Even if she does make the same expressions over and over, it is impossible that a picture taken outside and a picture in a shower room are exactly identical. So I must believe that it is a fake after all.

You can also see that the bit of roofing above her head is blurry, especially on the dark edge of the red wood there.

Of course, this is all for the sake of figuring out the authenticity of the photo. Again I hate to point all these things out; it would be rather interesting if it were indeed real. I came across this blog today and my positive opinions on Emma have turned around completely after reading the proof on how contradictory she really is. And while I myself would never spend this much time studying a celebrity's actions and behavior, I can see that you've done your research and everything you've posted can be backed up by evidence. There was always something fake about Emma that bothered me.

Anonymous said...

Interesting..... But how come when I check out your link the photo in the middle of the real and what is said to be fake looks photo shopped itself?

I'm looking for what you say is this blur above her head but I'm missing it. Everything with emma matches with the fake. As for the anatomy you can see emma does have a long neck. That matches with the breasts, nipples, chest bone and hand/knuckles.

I agree with the others. I'd say it's real. It's made to look like a fake. There is too much going on with it that matches with Emma's body. The girl's face complexion does not even match with the rest of her body. Emma face on the other hand does. So does her nip exposure photos.

Anonymous said...

The photo in the middle is definitely not photoshopped because it was part of a series of photos taken of her on some outing (I've seen them before; can't be bothered to find them now).

The blurriness on the wall edge above her head is difficult to see, but is definitely there if you zoom in. About the anatomy part, it's not a matter of how long her neck is, but the fact that it appears to be straining even though she is looking down; which can't really happen anatomically speaking.

Also, many girls have facial complexion (usually more pinkish) that is a different color from their body, either due to sunburn, breakouts, oil, etc... so the supposed real one could very well be real too.

Of course this is all my own opinion based on the observations I've made, so I'm not saying you have to believe it. I'm just adding to the discussion in hopes that people won't be deceived. It's all rather silly anyway; I'm sure that there is an authentic nudie shot of her somewhere out there, but this isn't it for me.

Anonymous said...

Let's leave it at this, she's fucking gorgeous and if I had the chance to have sex with her, I'd cum inside her so she gets pregnant and becomes mine forever :)

Echee said...

^ anonymous above me

Well there ya have it, lol. And people say I have issues. Just because someone is pretty does not mean they are perfect. Be careful what you wish for.

Sara said...

DUDE. perfect proof that this "fake" is real: the one with watson is more from a distance, and you can see the background is there. if it was really photoshopped from the "real" one, it would've been impossible to get such a perfect background, with the tub and everything, in continuation. they probably photoshopped the "real" one, as they zoomed in so that the head would fit better on the body. if someone had photoshopped the one with watson, they couldn't have expanded it to give it more detail that fits so impeccably, especially as visible in the left hand side of the photo's background and the location of the white switch in both. I'm pretty good with photoshop, and I was objective too until I saw that zoom. It's a classic sign.

Anonymous said...

I have a doubt regarding the nipples ... compare the one in the so called "fake" pic of Emma and the one in the blue dress .. The "fake" pic shows a pointed nipple but its different in the one with blue dress.

Anonymous said...

anon above, worth noting that in the one with the blue dress the nipples is soft, whereas it's erect in the towel pic

they're still identical

Warren said...

The Fake picture above is the real Emma Watson, I found another picture and look at the legs perfectly and the line near her leg of the bath tub they do not match.
Emma's leg is a lot closer to the line then the other girl.
The girl's leg seems far away.

Here's the link so you can see for yourself

http://malaysiaonlinetoday.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/emma2bwatson2527s2bfake2btopless2bphotos2bscandal2bat2bbrown2buniversity2bwww-gutteruncensored-com2b001.jpg

Anonymous said...

i hate the way this was proven fake and you still have it up echhee stop ruining your blog by posting photos that were clearly faked! stick to facts like you normally do

Echee said...

Quit trolling all my posts with lame comments. The post stays up as is. There are good comments here. We don't know if it real or fake. It's deemed as fake but that doesn't mean that it is fake or am i saying it is real. There are lots of simularities going on here. It's obvious and you cant deny it. Go back to your potter-hermione praise forums. Your not getting under my skin by the way. Your amusing in a sad way.

Warren said...

Did you notice the line on the bathtub is different to the one with Emma in it.
With the other girl she seems to far from it, no wonder her's was zoomed in, her leg is slightly in the wrong position.

What do you all think?

In case you missed my post above here is the link I am referring to:
http://malaysiaonlinetoday.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/emma2bwatson2527s2bfake2btopless2bphotos2bscandal2bat2bbrown2buniversity2bwww-gutteruncensored-com2b001.jpg

Anonymous said...

That's right, I noticed that the "real one" is zoomed in and is missing some of the room, whereas the one with Emma shows more of the room. That indicates it's the actual original.

Emma's is the real one.

Anonymous said...

echee you know this is fake. your smart don't ruin your blog with crap posts like this. "We don't know if it real or fake. It's deemed as fake but that doesn't mean that it is fake or am i saying it is real. " your deliberately staying on both sides of the border to act like your being impartial even though you clearly hate emma watson and are trying to ruin her name by whatever means possible. stick to what your good at. facts. it has been deemed fake. which means it is fake until there is extremely good evidence proving it is real thats how life works you don't guess weather someone is a murderer or not in court there has to be factual evidence to prove it so. experts have analyzed it and deemed it to be fake so move the fuck on. if your going to comment about this post. please answer everything i have said and not quote slight bits and ignore other parts its extremely annoying.

Anonymous said...

one more thing don't think i hate your blog just because of this comment echee ! a lot of your comments make sense and have perfectly factual evidence but your posts that encourage speculation and guess work just seem petty. sorry if you disagree its just how i feel thanks

Anonymous said...

You should read the comments. There's actually a lot of strong evidence for it being real, perhaps even more than there is for it being fake

Echee said...

anonymous above most of her fans dont read the comments. I have a hard time believing they read anything. They just rush to judge. Thanks for pointing that out.

side boob finder said...

I feel its a fake because the hair shadow does not match if her picture was real the hair shadow would have a darker fill near the bottom where her chin would block all light but it still has some signs of light getting through because in the other pic there is no chin just more hair

Anonymous said...

This blog is neither a sign of sanity nor of health in any way. Get help. Like, help-me-I'm-bat-shit-crazy help.

Anonymous said...

looked over many different quality and version both pictures. Emma's is a fake. They messed up in the shadowing on the wall behind her neck. You see light and bulges where they should not be.

Anonymous said...

I love how the so called "real" picture, looks more fake than Emma's one.

red said...

I am very much versed in photoshop, as part of my college course and now a major part of my job.

So, that being said, I quite firmly believe you cracked this, blogger. By that I mean the Emma picture is in fact, real. The other photo of the unknown girl has definitely been digitally manipulated, but the Emma photo doesn't show a single sign of it, it checks out as being fully authentic.

Very impressive find, here, blogger.

Hill said...

Echee, you should know that someone ran the so called "real picture", that is, the one of the unknown girl, through a image testing program (which is proven to work) and it found that it had been digitally manipulated, around the head and shoulders. They did the same with the photo of Emma Watson topless with the towel, and...dun dun, no digital manipulation was found in the image.

Interesting....?

Echee said...

Interesting... thanks